|
|
تعیین فازهای p و s با استفاده از حداکثر هم پوشانی تبدیل موجک گسسته (مطالعه موردی زمینلرزه 21 آبان 1396 سرپل ذهاب)
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
شکری کاوه محمد ,منصوری رضا ,کشاورز احمد
|
منبع
|
علوم و مهندسي زلزله - 1399 - دوره : 7 - شماره : 2 - صفحه:1 -20
|
چکیده
|
تشخیص خودکار و برداشت دقیق زمان ورود فازهای لرزه ای در تعیین مکان رویداد زلزله و تجزیهوتحلیل در سیستم های تشخیص زودهنگام زلزله دارای اهمیت ویژه ای است. در حال حاضر یکی از فرایندهای متداول برای شناسایی شروع فازهای لرزه ای روش دستی می باشد. این کار توسط یک تحلیلگر انجام می شود که به بررسی لرزه نگاشت می پردازد و سپس زمان شروع فازهای p و s را تشخیص میدهد. اینروش بسیار وقت گیر و تحت تاثیر نظر یا تجربه شخصی کاربر میباشد. جهت تجزیهوتحلیل داده های حجیم تولید شده در شبکه های لرزه نگاری ارائه یک الگوریتم خودکار و قابل اطمینان ضروری است. از اینرو در این مطالعه یک الگوریتم خودکار برای تعیین و قرائت زمان رسید فاز p از ترکیب نسخه حداکثر هم پوشانی تبدیل موجک گسسته و روش تشخیص لبه و برای تعیین زمان رسید فاز s از ترکیب این نسخه از تبدیل موجک (modwt) و روش خود برگشتی ارائه شده است. جهت ارزیابی الگوریتم های فاز خوانی، زمینلرزه 1396/08/21 سرپل ذهاب با بزرگای مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است. نتایج حاصل از قرائت موج p با برداشت های دستی و روش sta/lta و برداشت های حاصل از موج s تنها با برداشت های دستی مقایسه شده اند. الگوریتم های فازخوانی خودکار نتایج قابل قبولی را نشان می دهند.
|
کلیدواژه
|
تبدیل موجک، برداشت فاز، زمان رسید، زلزله، موج p وs، sta/lta
|
آدرس
|
دانشگاه خلیجفارس, دانشکده علوم پایه, گروه ژئوفیزیک, ایران, دانشگاه خلیجفارس, دانشکده علوم پایه, گروه ژئوفیزیک, ایران, دانشگاه خلیجفارس, دانشکده فنی مهندسی, گروه مهندسی برق, ایران
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of P and S Phase Using Maximum Overlap of Discrete Wavelet Transform (A Case Study on 2017 Sarpol-e Zahab Earthquake)
|
|
|
Authors
|
Shokri Kaveh Mohammad ,Mansour Raza ,Keshavarz Ahmad
|
Abstract
|
Automatic seismic phase picking algorithms are one of the current research topics and have special significance in seismic data processing requirements. One of the most fundamental tasks in seismology is the identification arrival time of seismic phases such as the compressional or Pwave, transversal or Swave, Rayleighwave, Lovewave, reflected and refracted wave from boundary layers must be identified. Seismic phase arrival time identification enables scientists to derive important geophysical and seismological information, such as the geotectonic settings, structure of the earth’s interior, seismicity of an area and seismic hazard assessment. Traditionally, these quantities were measured manually by human experts, but as seismic networks have grown worldwide, such tasks have been increasingly taken up by automated algorithms. because seismic network or even a single station operating continuously at high sampling frequency produces an enormous amount of data, processing of such a volume of waveforms manually is very timeconsuming and requires considerable manpower. In addition, due to human error, incorrect detection of the phase can affect future studies. Therefore, it is needed to an alternative more efficient, faster, and accurate method that reduces the human, financial and time costs and also decreases the probability of errors. Hence, in recent decades, significant efforts have been made to develop automatic phase picking methods. Wavelet transform is a tool in the analysis of nonstationary signals such as the seismic signal. This is due to the ability of the wavelet transform to resolve features at various scales [1]. In particular, there are two types of wavelet transforms, orthogonal as discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and nonorthogonal as maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform (MODWT). DWT is useful in decomposing time series data into an orthogonal set of components with different frequencies. Whereas MODWT is a variant of DWT that can handle any sample size. The smooth and detail coefficients of MODWT multiresolution analysis are associated with zero phase filters and produces a more asymptotically efficient wavelet variance estimator than the DWT [2]. Working in the wavelet domain allows multiresolution analysis of the waveform, and provides the means to distinguish the phase arrival from random or systematic noise. In this work, we take advantage of the wavelet transform properties and define characteristic functions to detect P and Swave arrivals. The version of the maximum overlap discrete wavelet transform (MODWT) is used to determine and picking the arrival time of the P and S phases. The methodology of this study is divided into two parts: the first part is about the determination of the P arrival time obtained by processing the stacked envelop of the wavelet transform coefficients. The second part is determining the S arrival time, the automatic Sphase detection algorithm that we present in this paper is a combination of wavelet transform (WT) and AR model. The estimation of arrival time of the S wave is done in two steps. At first, an initial estimation of arrival time is calculated using the MODWT transform. In the next step, the final estimation of the S wave arrival time is calculated using an AR model. Method is tested on a significant number of Kermanshah cluster earthquakes. The results of automatic phase picker algorithm in this study have been compared with the STA/LTA method to assess the accuracy.
|
Keywords
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|