سواد اطلاعاتی رشته‌‌مبنای (تخصّصی) دانشجویان دانشگاه‌‌های ایران در سال تحصیلی 1396-1397

هدف: سواد اطلاعاتی رشته‌‌‌مبنا اساس آموزش سواد اطلاعاتی به فراگیران برای کسب مهارت در اطلاع‌‌‌یابی در رشته تحصیلی خود است. هدف این پژوهش پیمایشیکاربردی تشخیص میزان و سطح سواد اطلاعاتی رشته‌‌‌مبنای دانشجویان در سال تحصیلی 96-97 بود. روش: برای گردآوری داده‌‌‌ها پرسشنامۀ محقق‌‌‌ساختۀ روا و پایایی در باب سواد اطلاعاتی رشته‌‌‌مبنا در اختیار نمونه‌‌‌ای متشکل از 1875 دانشجو در انواع گروه‌‌‌ها و رشته‌‌‌های آموزشی و مقاطع تحصیلی و انواع دانشگاه‌‌‌های کشور قرار گرفت. یافته‌‌‌ها: طبق یافته‌‌‌ها، بیشتر دانشجویان (39/6درصد) سطح سواد اطلاعاتی رشته‌‌‌مبنای نسبتاً پایینی دارند و میانگین نمرات آنان در حد متوسط (8/34) است. تفاوت نمرات دانشجویان از نظر گروه تحصیلی به نفع علوم پایه (با نمره 9/53)، از نظر مقطع تحصیلی به نفع دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی (با نمره 11/26) و از نظر نوع دانشگاه محل تحصیل به ضرر دانشگاه‌‌‌های غیرانتفاعی (با نمره 7/17) معنادار بود. نتیجه‌‌‌گیری: تدوین برنامه‌‌‌های درسی تلفیق شده با مهارت‌‌‌های سواد اطلاعاتی رشته‌‌‌مبنا و جهت‌‌‌گیری به سمت دانشگاه باسواد اطلاعاتی عامل توفیق در نظام آموزش عالی کشور در تربیت دانشجویان باسواد اطلاعاتی تخصصی است.

Disciplinary-based (Professional) Information Literacy of Iranian Students in the Academic Year of 2017-2018

Background and Aim: Information literacy is a foundation for all informationrelated professional skills for preparing them for better performing their careers. This applied survey aimed at determining the rate and level of DIL skills among Iranian students in the academic year 20172018.Method: A 20 item researchermade valid and reliable questionnaire on DIL was prepared by conducting a comprehensive literature review. Questionnaires were completed by 1875 male/female students as a purposeful sample, majoring in different disciplines, academic levels at different Iranian Universities in the academic year of 20172018. Data was analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics.Findings: Findings showed that several students (39.6%) had a relatively low DIL level and the mean rate of their DIL skills was a moderate (8.34 %). Differences were significant in regard to discipline, academic levels and Universities. Further, there was no significant difference between male and female students in their DIL levels. However, there was a significant difference in DIL scores among students majoring basic sciences. Considering the educational levels, Doctorate candidates had significantly higher DIL scores than undergraduate and graduate students. Students in private Universities had significantly lower DIL scores than students in State Universities.Conclusion: Disciplinarybased information literacy has not been very efficacious in Iranian Universities. Designing an ILsynthesized curriculum and turning toward the information literate University in training professionally informationliterate students is the drive for achieving a successful higher education system in Iran.Originality/Value: This study has equally theoretical and practical implications. Practically, depicts the general state of Iranian studentschr('39') DIL levels, it can apprise Iranchr('39')s higher educational system of the inevitability of drill skills as such in academic curriculum in all educational levels and scientific disciplines. As DIL is initially introduced in this study, it can be inspiring the theoretical approach of information literacy and its literature by adding a newlyemerged notion of disciplinarybased information literacy.