|
|
|
|
randomized crossover evaluation of quick-wee versus urine collection bag for infant urine collection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
salar alireza ,goli hamideh ,yoosefian nazanin ,jalalodini alia ,pournamdar zahra ,rezvaniamin mehdi
|
|
منبع
|
journal of nursing and midwifery sciences - 2025 - دوره : 12 - شماره : 4 - صفحه:1 -8
|
|
چکیده
|
Background :accurate diagnosis of urinary tract infection (uti) in infants requires a minimally contaminated urine sample. urine-collection bags are noninvasive but prone to contamination; invasive methods reduce contamination but cause discomfort. quick-wee, a stimulation-based clean-catch technique, may offer a faster, cleaner alternative. objectives :to compare microscopy-defined urine contamination — white blood cells (wbcs), red blood cells (rbcs), epithelial cells, and bacteria as primary outcomes — and collection time and caregiver satisfaction as secondary outcomes, between quick-wee and urine-bag collection in infants using a within-subject crossover design. methods :we conducted a randomized two-period, two-sequence (ab/ba) crossover study. each infant provided two samples about 6 hours apart within one shift. sequence (quick-wee → bag or bag → quick-wee) was assigned via a computer-generated list and sealed, opaque, sequentially numbered envelopes. a single trained pediatric nurse collected all samples per standard operating procedure (sop); diapers were changed, and the peri-urethral/genital area was washed and dried before each attempt. laboratory staff were blinded to method/sequence; samples bore anonymized codes. primary outcomes were quantitative microscopy counts [cells/high-power field (hpf) or semi-quantitative categories]; secondary outcomes were time to collection (minutes) and caregiver satisfaction (5-point likert). results :versus urine-bag collection, quick-wee yielded lower counts of wbc (-1.19; p < 0.001), rbc (-0.32; p = 0.007), and epithelial cells (-1.78; p < 0.001); bacterial counts did not differ (p = 0.096). collection time was markedly shorter with quick-wee (10.7 ± 8.9 vs. 52.4 ± 10.3 minutes; difference -41.7; p < 0.001). caregiver satisfaction was higher with quick-wee (median 5 vs. 3; p < 0.001). conclusions :quick-wee is a rapid, noninvasive method that reduces several microscopy-defined contamination indices, substantially shortens collection time, and improves caregiver satisfaction compared with urine-bag collection, with no significant difference in bacterial counts. findings support quick-wee as a pragmatic first-line option for infant urine collection.
|
|
کلیدواژه
|
pediatrics ,urine collection ,urinalysis ,urinary tract infection
|
|
آدرس
|
zahedan university of medical sciences, community nursing research center, iran, sabzevar university of medical sciences, non-communicable diseases research center, iran, zahedan university of medical sciences, community nursing research center, iran, zahedan university of medical sciences, community nursing research center, iran, zahedan university of medical sciences, community nursing research center, iran, zahedan university of medical sciences, community nursing research center, iran
|
|
پست الکترونیکی
|
mehdi@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|