گونه‌شناسی و ارزیابی نقدهای مفسران معاصر شیعی بر آراء علامه طباطبایی(مطالعه‌ی موردی سوره‌ی بقره)

ﻧﻈﺮات ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﯾﯽ ﺑﺎزﺗﺎب وﺳﯿﻊ و ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﭼﺸﻤﮕﯿﺮی ﺑﺮ آﺛﺎر ﻗﺮآﻧﯽ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺷﯿﻌﻪ داﺷﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ. اﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻔﺴﺮان ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺷﯿﻌﯽ ﻋﻼوه ﺑﺮ ﺑﻬﺮه ﮔﯿﺮی ﮔﺴﺘﺮده از ﻧﻈﺮات ﻣﺆﻟﻒ اﻟﻤﯿﺰان، در ﻣﻮارد ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﯽ ﻧﯿﺰ آرای اﯾﺸﺎن را ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ و ﻧﻘﺪ ﻗﺮار داده اﻧﺪ. ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﭘﯿﺶ رو ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎ روش ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻔﯽ-ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻠﯽ و ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از اﺑﺰار ﮐﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪ ای اﻧﺠﺎم ﺷﺪه، ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ی آﺛﺎر ﺗﻔﺴﯿﺮی ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ، ﺑﻪ ﮐﺸﻒ و اﺳﺘﺨﺮاج ادﻟﻪ ی ﻣﻔﺴﺮان در ﻧﻘﺪ آرای ﻣﺆﻟﻒ اﻟﻤﯿﺰان(ﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮن آﯾﺎت ﺳﻮره ی ﺑﻘﺮه) و ارزﯾﺎﺑﯽ آن ﻫﺎ ﻣﯽ ﭘﺮدازد. ﺑﺮﺧﯽ از ﻣﻔﺴﺮان در ﻣﻮاردی ﻧﻈﯿﺮ: ﭼﯿﺴﺘﯽ ﺣﺮوف ﻣﻘﻄﻌﻪ، ﮐﺸﻒ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﯽ واژﮔﺎن ﻗﺮآﻧﯽ، ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦ ﻣﺼﺎدﯾﻖ واژﮔﺎن و ﻋﺒﺎرات ﻗﺮآﻧﯽ، ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮم و ﻣﻔﺎد آﯾﺎت ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻧﻈﺮات ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﭘﺮداﺧﺘﻪ اﻧﺪ. ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ دﻻﯾﻞ ﻣﻮرد اﺳﺘﻨﺎد ﻧﺎﻗﺪان ﻋﺒﺎرﺗﻨﺪاز: ﻣﺒﻬﻢ ﺧﻮاﻧﺪن، ﺧﻼف واﻗﻊ داﻧﺴﺘﻦ، ﻧﺎﺳﺎزﮔﺎری ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻗﺮآﻧﯽ و رواﯾﯽ، ﺿﻌﯿﻒ و ﻧﺎﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ داﻧﺴﺘﻦ، ﻧﺎﺻﻮاب و ﻗﺎﺑﻞ اﺛﺒﺎت ﻧﺒﻮدن، ﻣﻐﺎﯾﺮت ﺑﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮم آﯾﺎت، ﻧﺎﺳﺎزﮔﺎری ﺑﺎ ادﻟّﻪ و آﯾﺎت ﻗﺮآﻧﯽ، ﻋﺪم دﻻﻟﺖ آﯾﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻔﺴﯿﺮ و... ﭘﺲ از ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ و ﺳﻨﺠﺶ آرای ﻧﺎﻗﺪان، ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﭼﻨﯿﻦ ﺑﯿﺎن ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮد ﮐﻪ اﻏﻠﺐ اﯾﻦ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﺑﻮده و ﺑﺎ آﺳﯿﺐ ﻫﺎ و اﺷﮑﺎﻻت اﺳﺎﺳﯽ ﻣﻮاﺟﻪ اﺳﺖ. اﻟﺒﺘﻪ در ﻣﻮارد ﻣﻌﺪودی ﻧﯿﺰ ﻧﻈﺮات ﻧﺎﻗﺪان ﺻﺤﯿﺢ و ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﺑﻮده و ﺿﻌﻒ دﯾﺪﮔﺎه ﻫﺎی ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﭘﺬﯾﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮد.

typology and evaluation of critiques of contemporary original research shiite commentators on the views of allameh tabataba’i (case study of surah al-baqarah)

allameh tabatabai’s views have been widely reflected and have had a significant impact on contemporary shiite quranic works. of course, contemporary shiite commentators, in addition to widely using the views of the author of al-mizan, have also examined and criticized his views in significant cases. leading research that has been done by descriptiveanalytical method and using library tools, by studying contemporary interpretive works, explores and extracts the arguments of commentators in criticizing the views of al-mizan author (about the verses of surah albaqarah) and evaluates them. some commentators have criticized allameh’s views in cases such as: what are the syllables, discovering the meanings of quranic words, determining the instances of quranic words and phrases, explaining the meaning and contents of verses. the most important reasons cited by critics are: vague reading, know the opposite, incompatibility with qur’anic sources and narration, consider weak and invalid, incorrect and unprovable, contradiction with the meaning of verses, incompatibility with qur’anic evidences and verses, lack of meaning of the verse on interpretation, etc. after reviewing and evaluating the opinions of critics, the results of the research show that most of these criticisms are invalid and face major harms and problems. of course, in a few cases, the opinions of critics are correct and valid, and the weakness of allameh’s views is accepted. of course, in a few cases, the opinions of the critics are valid and the weakness of allameh’s views is accepted