intravenous lidocaine versus morphine sulfate in pain management for extremity fractures; a clinical trial

Introduction: considering the existing contradictions regarding effectiveness of intravenous (iv) lidocaine, especially in emergency department (ed), the present study was designed to compare the analgesic effect of iv lidocaine and morphine sulfate in pain management for extremity bone fractures. methods: in this triple blind clinical trial, 15 to 65 year-old patients with extremity fractures and in need of pain management were randomly allocated to either iv lidocaine or morphine sulfate group and were compared regarding severity of pain 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after infusion via intention to treat analysis. the absolute risk reduction, number needed to treat and relative risk of iv lidocaine after 30 minutes were 0.40 (95%ci: 0.25 – 0.64), 7 (95%ci: 3.7 – 23.1), and 20.71 (95%ci: 10.91 – 30.51), respectively. results: 280 patients with the mean age of 32.50 ± 12.77 years were randomly divided into 2 equal groups of 140 (73.9% male). the 2 groups had similar baseline char- acteristics. 15 minutes success rate was 49.28% in lidocaine and 33.57% in morphine sulfate group (p = 0.011), and after 30 minutes it reached to 85.71% and 65.00%, respectively (p < 0.001). conclusion: based on the results of the present study, iv lidocaine could be considered as a reasonable alternative choice for pain management in ed.