|
|
|
|
priority setting meets multiple streams: a match to be further examined?; comment on “introducing new priority setting and resource allocation processes in a canadian healthcare organization: a case study analysis informed by multiple streams theory”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
cumming jacqueline margaret
|
|
منبع
|
international journal of health policy and management - 2016 - دوره : 5 - شماره : 8 - صفحه:497 -499
|
|
چکیده
|
With demand for health services continuing to grow as populations age and new technologies emerge to meet health needs, healthcare policy-makers are under constant pressure to set priorities, ie, to make choices about the health services that can and cannot be funded within available resources. in a recent paper, smith et al apply an influential policy studies framework – kingdon’s multiple streams approach (msa) – to explore the factors that explain why one health service delivery organization adopted a formal priority setting framework (in the form of programme budgeting and marginal analysis [pbma]) to assist it in making priority setting decisions. msa is a theory of agenda-setting, ie, how it is that different issues do or do not reach a decision-making point. in this paper, i reflect on the use of the msa framework to explore priority setting processes and how the framework might be applied to similar cases in future.
|
|
کلیدواژه
|
priority setting ,resource allocation ,programme budgeting and marginal analysis (pbma) ,canada
|
|
آدرس
|
victoria university of wellington, health services research centre, new zealand
|
|
پست الکترونیکی
|
jackie.cumming@vuw.ac.nz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|