|
|
|
|
Public Participation: Methods Matter; A Response to Boaz et al.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
Burton Paul ,Whitty Jennifer A ,Kendall Elizabeth ,Ratcliffe Julie ,Wilson Andrew ,Littlejohns Peter ,Scuffham Paul A
|
|
منبع
|
international journal of health policy and management - 2014 - دوره : 3 - شماره : 6 - صفحه:355 -355
|
|
چکیده
|
The commentary on our paper from boaz et al. is both welcome and pertinent, especially in its call for greater critical attention to be paid to some of the underlying principles of participation as well as to techniques and methods (1,2). in some respects our paper and subsequent research was designed to allow us to measure and better understand the impact of participating in a citizen’s jury on the jurors’ views and expressed preferences (1,3).
|
|
کلیدواژه
|
Public Participation ,Deliberation ,Citizens Juries ,Discrete Choice Experiments ,Preferences ,Priority Setting
|
|
آدرس
|
Urban Research Program, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia, Australia, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Australia, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Logan Campus, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia, Australia, Flinders Health Economics Group, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia, Australia, Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, Australia, Division of Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, UK, UK, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Logan Campus, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|