Why Even the Logic of Re-Defined Choice May Still Contradict the Logic of Care in Public Health Systems?

I would like to thank dr. benjamin ewert (1) for his commentary on my short paper ‘is patient choice the future of health care systems?’ (2) for three reasons. first, because i take heart from his support for my key thesis about the need to replace simplistic economic constructs underlying policy assumptions to explain how patients make health-related decisions in real life. second, because it gives me the opportunity to, on the one hand, clarify my arguments on how health users’ embeddedness in social relations and patients’ multiple identities and personal circumstances influence these decisions; and to elaborate on the role of trust in this processes in more detail on the other hand. third, because dr. ewert’s contribution helped me re-think issues concerning the importance of patient choice in the context of new challenges that public health systems face such as the threat to free and universal provision of health care services. although i fully agree with the rejection of the obsolete conception of choice that tends to dominate current policy debates, i do believe that his conviction concerning the inescapability of choice requires some further qualifications. this stems from the recognition of users expressed desire to trade off choice against other more important attributes of health care which have to do with their values and norms originating in the ethics of care, and which makes provision of health services possible.