|
|
what, where, and how to collect real-world data and generate real-world evidence to support drug reimbursement decision-making in asia: a reflection into the past and a way forward
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
kc sarin ,lin lydia wenxin ,bayani diana beatriz samson ,zemlyanska yaroslava ,adler amanda ,ahn jeonghoon ,chan kelvin ,choiphel dechen ,genuino-marfori anne julienne ,kearney brendon ,liu yuehua ,nakamura ryota ,pearce fiona ,prinja shankar ,pwu raoh-fang ,shafie arsul akmal ,sui binyan ,suwantika auliya ,tunis sean ,wu hui-min ,zalcberg john ,zhao kun ,isaranuwatchai wanrudee ,teerawattananon yot ,wee hwee-lin
|
منبع
|
international journal of health policy and management - 2023 - دوره : 12 - شماره : Issue 1 - صفحه:1 -9
|
چکیده
|
Background globally, there is increasing interest in the use of real-world data (rwd) and real-world evidence (rwe) to inform health technology assessment (hta) and reimbursement decision-making. using current practices and case studies shared by eleven health systems in asia, a non-binding guidance that seeks to align practices for generating and using rwd/rwe for decision-making in asia was developed by the real world data in asia for health technology assessment in reimbursement (realise) working group, addressing a current gap and needs among hta users and generators.methods the guidance document was developed over two face-to-face workshops, in addition to an online survey, a face-to-face interview and pragmatic search of literature. the specific focus was on what, where and how to collect rwd/rwe.results all 11 realise member jurisdictions participated in the online survey and the first in-person workshop, 10 participated in the second in-person workshop, and 8 participated in the in-depth face-to-face interviews. the guidance document was iteratively reviewed by all working group members and the international advisory panel. there was substantial variation in: (a) sources and types of rwd being used in hta, and (b) the relative importance and prioritization of rwe being used for policy-making. a list of national-level databases and other sources of rwd available in each country was compiled. a list of useful guidance on data collection, quality assurance and study design were also compiled.conclusion the realise guidance document serves to align the collection of better quality rwd and generation of reliable rwe to ultimately inform hta in asia.
|
کلیدواژه
|
asia ,cost-effectiveness analysis ,health technology assessment ,real-world data ,real-world evidence ,reimbursement
|
آدرس
|
ministry of health, health intervention and technology assessment program (hitap), thailand, national university of singapore (nus), saw swee hock school of public health, singapore, national university of singapore (nus), saw swee hock school of public health, singapore, national university of singapore (nus), saw swee hock school of public health, singapore, university of oxford, oxford centre for diabetes, uk, ewha womans university, south korea, sunnybrook odette cancer centre, canada. sunnybrook research institute, canada. canadian centre for applied research in cancer control, canada, ministry of health, essential medicine and technology division, department of medical services, bhutan, department of health, health technology assessment unit, philippines, university of adelaide, faculty of medicine, australia. health policy advisory committee on technology, australia, ministry of health, china health technology assessment centre, national health development research centre, china, hitotsubashi university, hitotsubashi institute for advanced study, japan, ministry of health, agency for care effectiveness, australia, post graduate institute of medical education and research, school of public health, department of community medicine, india, ministry of health and welfare, taiwan national hepatitis c program office, taiwan, universiti sains malaysia, school of pharmaceutical sciences, malaysia, ministry of health, china health technology assessment centre, national health development research centre, china, universitas padjadjaran, faculty of pharmacy, department of pharmacology and clinical pharmacy, indonesia, center for medical technology policy (cmtp), usa, ministry of health and welfare, taiwan national hepatitis c program office, taiwan, monash university, school of public health and preventive medicine, cancer research program, australia. alfred hospital, department of medical oncology, australia, ministry of health, china health technology assessment centre, national health development research centre, china, ministry of health, health intervention and technology assessment program (hitap), thailand. st. michael’s hospital, centre for excellence in economic analysis research, canada. university of toronto, institute of health policy, canada, ministry of health, health intervention and technology assessment program (hitap), thailand. national university of singapore (nus), saw swee hock school of public health, singapore, national university of singapore (nus), faculty of science, saw swee hock school of public health, department of pharmacy, singapore
|
پست الکترونیکی
|
weehweelin@nus.edu.sg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|