responding to food industry initiatives to be “part of the solution”; comment on “‘part of the solution’: food corporation strategies for regulatory capture and legitimacy”

In response to growing concerns about chronic diseases, food insecurity, low-wage food labor, and global warming, the food industry has developed new strategies to respond to its critics and pursue its business and political goals. as lacy-nicholas and williams described in a recent review, the food industry has expanded its repertoire from opposition to critics to appeasement, co-option, and partnerships. defining themselves as “part of the solution,” the food industry seeks to disarm its opponents, shift policy debates to favor its interests, or delay decisions that jeopardize its profits or power. this commentary explores how health professionals, can respond to this changing repertoire. lessons from previous campaigns to control harmful industry practices, suggest that no single strategy will counter changing food industry efforts to achieve its goals. thus, advocates must consider a portfolio of approaches that can be deployed in response to changing circumstances, industry tactics, and threats to health.