|
|
|
|
What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Premodern Science
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
Gamini Amir-Mohammad
|
|
منبع
|
تاريخ علم - 1400 - دوره : 19 - شماره : 1 - صفحه:1 -8
|
|
|
|
|
چکیده
|
Although shapin in his book claims a freedom from anachronism, it is not without anachronistic orientations. he cannot hesitate, at least occasionally, to represent the sciences of the middle ages as teleological, mythic, nonexperimental, nonmechanical knowledge and strongly under the influence of the religious discourses. it seems he is not able to hesitate about a comparison between modern mechanical science and ancient sciences. this comparison, i believe, usually leads to underestimate the premodern sciences, at least for the young readers. in some places, shapin follows a completely partial approach. he presents the rivals of the modern science in seventeenth century as a vulgar knowledge, which leads the reads to see no difference between ancient sciences and the vulgar knowledge of the nature. although shapin is aware of the rhetoric of those times, he never tries to represent a pure image of the scientificmathematical knowledge of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries
|
|
کلیدواژه
|
Anachronism ,Ancient Sciences ,Aristotle ,Ptolemy
|
|
آدرس
|
University Of Tehran, Institute For The History Of Science, Iran
|
|
پست الکترونیکی
|
amirgamini@ut.ac.ir
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What do we talk about when we talk about premodern science
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
Gamini Amir-Mohammad
|
|
Abstract
|
Although Shapin in his book claims a freedom from anachronism, it is not without anachronistic orientations. He cannot hesitate, at least occasionally, to represent the sciences of the Middle Ages as teleological, mythic, nonexperimental, nonmechanical knowledge and strongly under the influence of the religious discourses. It seems he is not able to hesitate about a comparison between modern mechanical science and ancient sciences. This comparison, I believe, usually leads to underestimate the premodern sciences, at least for the young readers. In some places, Shapin follows a completely partial approach. He presents the rivals of the modern science in seventeenth century as a vulgar knowledge, which leads the reads to see no difference between ancient sciences and the vulgar knowledge of the nature. Although Shapin is aware of the rhetoric of those times, he never tries to represent a pure image of the scientificmathematical knowledge of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries
|
|
Keywords
|
anachronism ,ancient sciences ,Aristotle ,Ptolemy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|