هوش مصنوعی و مسئله دار کردنِ درون مایه های امنیت ملی

زمینه اصلی این پژوهش، ارائه چارچوبی گسترده است که از طریق آن نقش هوش مصنوعی در استفاده غیراخلاقی از کارکردهای آن در مسائل امنیتی بصورت نظری و عملی مورد ارزیابی جدی قرار گیرد. پرسش اصلی پژوهش این است که درون مایه های امنیت ملی بر اساس آموزه های دوران استیلاء و هژمونی؛ هوش مصنوعی را چگونه می توان در قالب تروریسم، جنگ، تنازع و دفاع مسئله دار کرد؟ در پاسخ به پرسش، این فرضیه مطرح می گردد که «امنیت ملی» بر اساس شاخصه ‏ های معرفتی- عملی ارائه ‏شده، ظرفیت و قابلیت تببین و تفهیم این ‏‏مسئله را دارد چراکه بر اساس نظریه های موجود در مطالعات امنیت ملی اعم از جریان اصلی و جریان انتقادی، هیچ‏کدام بصورت جامع و کامل، نه ‏‏می تواند درون مایه های مذکورِ امنیت ملی در عصر هوش مصنوعی و کلان داده را مسئله مند کند و نه پاسخگوی مسائل مرتبط با این حوزه در ساحتِ عملِ مناسبات امنیت ملی باشد. زمینه‌سازی برای کاربست عملی امنیت ملی با رویکرد داده بنیاد جز با نگاه مسئله مند تروریسم، جنگ و تنازع به سامان نخواهد شد و یکی از مصادیق راهبردی این الگوواره، «امنیت ملی الگوریتمی» است که پتانسیل ایجاد و تکوین نظم نوین امنیتی دیگری را به اثبات رسانیده است.

artificial intelligence and problematization of national security topics

introductionsome governments and organizations are preparing to exploit artificial intelligence (ai) in order to destabilize the world and benefit from numerous cyber-attacks. the rapid advancement of ai enables cybercriminals to amplify their destructive impact worldwide, as ai has the potential to reshape and disrupt global conditions in the coming years. the primary objective of this research was to establish a comprehensive framework for critically evaluating the role of ai in facilitating unethical practices within the realm of security, both in theory and in practice. to lay the groundwork for the practical implementation of national security measures based on grounded theory requires adopting a problem-oriented perspective on terrorism, warfare, and conflict. a strategic instance of this approach is the concept of algorithmic national security which has the potential for creating and developing a new security order. this article aimed to contribute to the existing body of scientific literature, as there is currently a dearth of research in this field, thereby paving the way for future investigations. the primary objective of this research was to establish a comprehensive framework for critically evaluating the role of ai in facilitating unethical practices within the realm of security, both in theory and in practice. the present research aimed to develop a comprehensive framework for the critical evaluation of the role of ai in the unethical utilization of its functions in security matters, both in theory and in practice. in this line, the main question is: how can national security topics be problematized in light of ai hegemony and within the framework of terrorism, war, conflict, and defense?materials and methodsadopting a descriptive–analytical approach, the present research relied on library research and documentary method to collect the data from various printed and electronic sources, including websites and magazines. note-taking was used as a tool in data collection stage. in this study, ai and national security were considered as the independent and dependent variables, respectively.results and discussionthe debate surrounding the use of ai and its autonomy on future battlefields has predominantly centered on the ethical implications of granting complete authority to independent and autonomous weapons, often referred to as killer robots, capable of making life or death decisions. is it truly feasible for these systems to operate without any human intervention, or does their deployment potentially violate the principles of warfare and international humanitarian laws? avoiding such a predicament necessitates that those involved in warfare differentiate between combatants and civilians on the battlefield, prioritizing the preservation of civilian lives and minimizing harm to them to the greatest extent possible.proponents of this emerging technology argue that machines will eventually possess enough intelligence to distinguish themselves from humans. conversely, opponents maintain that machines will never possess the capability to make such a fundamental distinction.