comparative study of graduate students’ self-perceived needs for written feedback and supervisors’ perceptions

This study was an attempt to examine the supervisors’ and graduate students’ needs for written feedback on thesis/dissertation and juxtaposed them to see how each group views feedback. a mixed-methods design was employed to collect the data. questionnaires and interviews were deployed to collect the data from 132 graduate tefl students and 37 supervisors from 10 iranian universities. results indicated that there were similarities (argument, logical order, transition, clarity, and references decisions) and differences (inclusion of information, formatting, grammar, conclusion, introduction, and consistency) between the priorities given by the m.a. and ph.d. students. moreover, the findings indicated that the m.a. students’ expressed priorities were not similar to those of the supervisors except in 3 areas (argument, formatting, and grammar). on the contrary, the supervisors’ priorities were close to those expressed by the ph.d. students in almost all cases. different factors underlying the perceptions of the students and supervisors were also extracted and presented. some implications and suggestions for further research are proposed