دولت و زبان استعاره‌‌ای در سیاست (با تاکید بر سخنرانی تنفیذ رئیسی)

زبان به‌عنوان یکی از منابع مهم در شکل‌‌گیری تجارب و نظام‌‌های معنایی هیچ‌‌گاه «خنثی» نیست و معنا همان‌‌قدر که از «متن» ناشی می‌‌شود، از بافت یا زمینه‌‌های اجتماعی و فرهنگی نیز تاثیر می‌‌پذیرد. این واحدهای زبانی در کنار بافت موقعیتی رابطه‌‌ای را بین متن و ایدئولوژی برقرار می‌‌کند که با «استعاره» به جامعه القا می‌‌شود. پرسش اصلی این است که زبان دولت سیزدهم از چه قالب استعاره‌‌ای در فضای ذهنی سیاست استفاده می‌‌کند؟ فرضیه بر آن استوار است که دلالت‌‌های فرا‌‌زبانی و شیوه‌‌های درونی واحدهای گفتاری دولت از دو مفهوم آگونیست اخلاقی و آنتاگونیست سیاسی تشکیل ‌شده است. یافته‌‌ها نشان می‌‌دهد شکل‌‌گیری این حوزه‌‌های معنایی با استفاده از استعاره‌‌های مفهومی بین دو حوزه «مبدا برخورد» و حوزه «مقصد دولت» و طرح‌‌واره‌‌ انتزاعی نیرو – پویایی، الگوهای برخورد، مانع، ظرف، اجبار، نیروی مخالف و حلقه، مقوله‌‌بندی و مفهوم‌‌سازی شده است. ازاین‌رو یک هستی اِعمال‌‌کننده‌‌ نیرو مورد توجه کانونی قرار می‌‌گیرد. در این میان، هستی زورمند، آنتاگونیست است که تمایل ذاتی آن به‌سوی عمل است؛ در مقابل آگونیست به‌سوی بی‌‌عملی و تاثیرپذیری حرکت می‌‌کند. در سخنرانی تنفیذ رئیسی دشمنی دشمنان (آنتاگونیست) و پایان دادن به بی‌‌عملی (آگونیست اخلاقی)، مسیری است که با نوعی حکمرانی نوین در امر سیاست همراه است. در این قالب ذهنی، طرحواره‌‌های تصویری «داخل - خارج»، «جزء - کل» و «حلقه» با کلید استعاری «برخورد» زبان استعاری دولت سیزدهم را تشکیل می‌‌دهد. این پژوهش به روش «پراگلجاز» و با استفاده از چارچوب نظری استعاره‌‌های مفهومی، زبان استعاری دولت را بررسی می‌کند.

state and metaphorical language in politics; (with emphasis of raisi’s speech in ceremony officially endorsed)

introductionlanguage, as one of the most important sources in the formation of experiences and semantic systems, is never neutral and the meaning is influenced by the context or the social and cultural context as much as it comes from the text . these linguistic units, together with the situational context, establish a relationship between the text and the ideology that is inculcated in society through metaphor .the relationship between language and the state has been the subject of extensive research in cognitive linguistics and political science. one such topic is conceptual metaphors and their function in increasing legitimacy and realizing ideological viewpoints in official speeches, including presidential inaugurations. therefore, the central question is: what metaphorical framework does the language of the 13th government employ within the political cognitive landscape? methodologypragglejaz is employed as a tool for identifying metaphors. by conducting a comprehensive analysis of the text, including speeches, the source domain of conflict and the target domain of politics are determined. in conceptual metaphors, the metaphorical direction is from left to right, moving from the concrete source domain to the abstract target domain. the main question is: what form of metaphor does the language of the 13th government use in the mental space of politics? the hypothesis is based on the fact that the extra-linguistic implications and internal practices of government speech units consist of two concepts: moral agonist and political antagonist.findingsthe findings of this study are discussed under the following themes:religious politics and in-out image schemagrounded in the intertwined concepts of religion and politics, governance is predicated upon a teleological understanding of history. consequently, the ontological nature of the political must be analyzed through the lens of inevitable antagonistic approaches, manifested as a perennial conflict. thus, the president’s inaugural address, marked by the metaphorical language of conflict, offers a tangible manifestation of these ideas, positioning this confrontation as an inherent tension between us and them. quality of life and the part-whole schemaas an integral part of society, the government is obligated to transform the existing state of affairs into a more desirable one, thereby improving the quality of life. the schema of part-whole serves as a representation of this framework. within this causal chain, the agent (the government), with the intention of performing an action, mobilizes a part or all of its body (the government body) to initiate the causal event (the change in status). the metaphors of foot and step, as a body part and a path, respectively, are conceptualized within the framework of the government is person metaphor and the part-whole schema.ethical politics and the link schemapolitics is understood as the pursuit of the good life and justice, aligning with ethics to foster a flourishing life for citizens. the realization of human flourishing, encompassing moral development, economic prosperity, and education, is intrinsically linked to practical wisdom and the ethical conduct of both the government and its citizens, who bear reciprocal duties. consequently, raisi’s characterization of the second step document as wise and penned by a sage leader reflects a the link schema, emphasizing the interconnectedness of political and ethical endeavors.analysisin his inauguration speech on august 3, 2021, ebrahim raisi employed three conceptual frameworks to articulate political antagonism and the relationship between ethics and politics. firstly, he utilized the container schema to establish boundaries between us and them, as well as in and out. secondly, he employed the part-whole schema, conceptualizing the government as a component of a larger whole.