>
Fa   |   Ar   |   En
   چالش‌های برنامه همکاری‌های جامع ایران و چین: با تاکید بر معمای امنیتی اتحادها  
   
نویسنده غرایاق زندی داود
منبع سياست - 1401 - دوره : 52 - شماره : 1 - صفحه:133 -152
چکیده    ایران و چین در 1399 سند برنامه همکاری‌های جامع 25 ساله را در قالب راهبرد ابرپروژه «یک راه، یک کمربند» چین امضا کردند. مطالعه متن سند غیررسمی منتشرشده نشان می‌دهد که این توافق فراتر از جایگاه ایران در راهبرد چین است و به‌نوعی سند توسعه عمومی کشور را در برمی‌گیرد. از آنجا که چین قرار است موتور توسعه کشور باشد، ایران باید مزیت‌های شایان ‌توجهی در قبال این همکاری داشته باشد، تا طرف چینی چنین تعهدی را متقبل شود. پرسش اصلی مقاله این است که با توجه به نابرابری قدرت دو کشور، مهم‌ترین چالش‌های احتمالی پیش‌روی ایران در این سند چیست؟ براساس نظریه اتحادها، معمای امنیتی اتحادها مهم‌ترین چالشی است که این اتحاد به‌همراه خواهد داشت که در دو وجه خودمختاری/ امنیت، و به‌دام افتادن/ ترک اتحاد، چالش‌زا خواهد بود. در فرضیه پژوهشی استدلال می‌شود که برقراری توازن قدرت و تقویت منافع مشترک، با ایجاد نوعی وابستگی متقابل بین دو کشور هم‌پیمان برتر و ضعیف‌تر مانع بروز معمای امنیتی اتحادها خواهد شد. با استفاده از روش پژوهش تحلیل محتوای مفهومی کیفی سند برنامه همکاری جامع 25 ساله دو کشور، مهم‌ترین دستاورد به‌دست‌آمده این است که با توجه به اهمیت محوری اصل بنیادین سیاست خارجی جمهوری اسلامی، یعنی پرهیز از سلطه‌جویی و سلطه‌پذیری، برای کاهش اهرم فشار غرب و تلاش برای تغییر یکجانبه‌گرایی امریکا در نظام بین‌الملل، نباید زمینه وابستگی به شرق ایجاد شود. برای روبه‌رو نشدن با معمای امنیتی اتحادها، اجرای سیاست‌های برقراری توازن و نوعی بازدارندگی دوجانبه در قبال هر دو غرب و شرق، در عین بهره‌برداری از دو طرف برای حفظ منافع ملی کشور پیشنهاد می‌شود.
کلیدواژه برنامه همکاری‌های جامع ایران و چین، اتحاد، امنیت، معمای امنیتی، وابستگی
آدرس دانشگاه شهید بهشتی, دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی, گروه علوم سیاسی, ایران
پست الکترونیکی d_zandi@sbu.ac.ir
 
   the challenges of iranchina 25year comprehensive cooperation plan, with an emphasis on the alliance security dilemma  
   
Authors غرایاق زندی davoud
Abstract    on march 2021, iran and china signed an agreement as part of the chinese grand strategy, best known as belt and road initiatives (bri), which is a longterm plan to enable the chinese government to project its power in the three continents of asia, africa and europe by the 100th anniversary of the founding of the communist party of china, and its revolution in 2049. a qualitative content analysis of the unofficially published agreement shows that it goes beyond the perceived position of iran in the bri and echoes iran’s national development plans.  if it means that china would become an engine of growth for iran, there might be strategic reasons for the chinese side to accept such a commitment. thereupon, the main research question is as follows: given the unequal power position of the two countries in the international system, what would be the primary challenges facing iran as they relate to the iranchina 25year comprehensive cooperation plan? it is widely argued that the main challenge of alliance is its security dilemma which include the two dimensions of autonomy/security and entrapment/abandonment paradoxes. in the research hypothesis, it is postulated that the creation of a balance of power and strengthening common interest is likely to lead to a kind of interdependence between the two superior and weaker countries, and will prevent the emergence of the  security dilemmas of alliances.the method used in the paper is the qualitative content analysis by which the researcher is able to objectively and systematically explain the content of any document such as the sinoiran agreement. this method of analysis will be used to reveal the potential challenges facing the iranian side as a result of signing the agreement. in general, states’ primary interest inherent in their objectives to form an alliance might be classified as follows: a) to restore the balance of power, from a realist perspective; and b) to counterbalance against a perceived balance of threat. there are two issues  that are associate with the alliance security dilemma; the first one is that in the absence of power parity, maintaining the security of the inferior state by the superior one would be at the expense of the autonomy of the inferior partner, particularly in its security decisionmaking process. the second one is that if the superior state strives to provide a security umbrella for the inferior state, it might be entrapped into an unwanted conflict with other great powers. of course, if the powerful state fails to protect its ally against other influential states, the inferior partner consequently may decide not to stay in the alliance, and choose the abandonment as its best option. the issues that threaten all alliances are security dilemmas or predicament situation for the states which are in the alliance. these are daunting challenges for the main decisionmakers who must decide when, in what situations, how, and with what outcomes to enter an alliance or withdraw from it. in general, three factors should be considered: what are the needs for the formation of an alliance, to what extent the alliance partners would meet those needs, and what are the actual terms and conditions of the contract forming the alliance.in the conclusion, it is argued that since one of the guiding principles of iri’s foreign policy is the rejection of all forms of domination, it is of paramount importance not to rely on the east (e.g., china) in an attempt to avoid impressive pressures of the west.  by considering the costs and benefits of the challenges posed by the agreement, iran can avoid the alliance security dilemma, lower the likelihood of onesided dependency by emphasizing dual deterrence from the west and east in accordance with the principles of iran’s foreign policy. accordingly, iran urgently needs to reevaluate all factors involved in the allianceformation process, particularly  the alliance needs, and the expected outcomes of the terms specified in the text of the bilateral agreement.
 
 

Copyright 2023
Islamic World Science Citation Center
All Rights Reserved