>
Fa   |   Ar   |   En
   بررسی جای‎ نام شهر کَثه براساس اسناد مکتوب و داده‎ های باستان شناسی  
   
نویسنده میردهقان اشکذری فضل اله ,بختیاری آرمان
منبع پژوهش هاي باستان شناسي ايران - 1400 - دوره : 11 - شماره : 31 - صفحه:81 -101
چکیده    کَثَه، یکی از مراکز استقراری است که به‌همراه میبد، نائین و فهرج، چهار شهر مهم ناحیۀ یزد را تشکیل می‌دادند. اگرچه متون محلی یزد، ایجاد آن‌را مربوط به دوران قبل از اسلام می‌دانند که توسط «اسکندر مقدونی» احداث شده و در دوران اسلامی موجودیت نداشته است؛ با این‌وجود، متون جغرافیایی از آن به‌عنوان یکی از شهرهای دوران اسلامی نام‌می‌برند. این مقاله با هدف بررسی جای‌نام شهر کثه و با شیوۀ توصیفی تاریخیتحلیلی به‌دنبال پاسخ‌گویی به این پرسش‌ها است؛ 1جایگاه شهر کثه در منابع چیست؟ 2با توجه به ویژگی‌های جغرافیایی دشت یزداردکان و تطبیق آن با توصیفات متون، کدام‌یک از مراکز استقراری در این دشت را می‌توان با کثه مطابقت داد؟ متون محلی کثه را از ساخته‌های اسکندر می‌دانند که برخی از اسرای گرفته‎شده در نبرد با «داریوش سوم» را در آنجا زندانی می‎کند. این شهر پس از ساخت شهر یزد، متروک شده و ساکنین به این شهر مهاجرت می‌کنند. اما، جغرافیدانان آن‌را یکی از مراکز استقراری ناحیۀ یزد در دوران اسلامی دانسته که نشان‌دهندۀ تناقض بین گفته‌های آنان با متون محلی یزد است. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که جغرافیدانان مسلمان با توجه به ویژگی‌های جغرافیایی ناحیۀ یزد از واژۀ کثه برای نامیدن یکی از مراکز استقراری آن استفاده کرده‌اند که با تطبیق توصیفات آنان با ویژگی‌های جغرافیایی دشت یزداردکان می‌توان دهستان رستاق را پیشنهاد داد؛ چراکه این دهستان از همان ابتدا از مجموع چندین روستا تشکیل شده بود که این روند تا به امروز نیز ادامه دارد. این دهستان از دیرباز یکی از قطب‌های کشاورزی استان یزد به‌شمار می‌آید. هم‌چنین به‌دلیل وجود راه ریکرمان از اهمیت زیادی برخوردار و به‌واسطۀ وجود آن با استقرارهای جنوب و جنوب‌شرق ایران در ارتباط بوده است. این‌امر با توجه به داده‌های باستان‌شناسی قابل اثبات است.
کلیدواژه شهر یزد، ناحیۀ یزد، کَثَه، سکه های ساسانی، منابع جغرافیایی
آدرس دانشگاه بوعلی سینا, دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی, گروه ایران شناسی, ایران, دانشگاه بوعلی سینا, دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی, گروه زبان‎ های باستانی, ایران
پست الکترونیکی rabakhtyari@basu.ac.ir
 
   Research on the City of Kathah Based on Writing Documents and Archaeological Data  
   
Authors Mirdehqan-Ashkzari Falollah ,Bakhtiari Arman
Abstract    Kathah is one of the settlement centers that together with Meybod, Naein and Fahraj formed the four important cities of Yazd region. According to the local texts, its creation is considered to be related to the preIslamic period, which was built by Alexander and did not exist in the Islamic period; nevertheless, geographical texts mention it as one of the cities of the Islamic period. This article aims to study the name of the city of Kathah and with an analyticalhistoricaldescriptive method seeks to answer the following questions: 1. What is the position of the city of Kathah in the sources? 2. Considering the geographical features of YazdArdakan plain and its adaptation to the descriptions of the texts, which of the settlement centers in this plain can be matched with Kathah? Local texts consider Kathah to be one of Alexander’s compositions, where he imprisoned some of the captives taken during the battle with Darius III. After the construction of Yazd, this city was abandoned and the residents migrated to this city. However, geographers consider it as one of the settlement centers of the Yazd region in the Islamic period, which shows the contradiction between their statements and the local texts of Yazd. The results of this study show that Muslim geographers have used the word Kathah to refer to one of its settlement centers according to the geographical features of Yazd region. By matching their descriptions with the geographical features of YazdArdakan plain, Rustaq Dehestan can be suggested; because this Dehestan was composed of several villages from the very beginning, and this process continues to this day. This Dehestan has long been considered one of the agricultural hubs of Yazd province. Also, due to the existence of the ReyKerman road, it is very important and due to its existence, it has been connected with the settlements in the south and southeast of Iran. This can be proven by archaeological data.Keywords: Yazd City, Yazd District, Kasah, Sasanian Coins, Geographical Resources. IntroductionOne of the important cases that can be mentioned about the Yazd region is the existence of ambiguities about Kathah and the city of Yazd, which has caused different researchers to have different opinions about it. Also, one of the factors that has increased the ambiguity is the lack of archaeological data that can be related to polygamy. Although the city of Yazd was the center of local governments such as Alkakoyeh, Atabakan and AlMuzaffar, but throughout its history has not been the center of great governments and despite of the harsh weather conditions, it has caused Muslim geographers to have little information about it. For this reason, it can be seen that at least in the early Islamic centuries, they did not provide much information about the Yazd, which was one of the mints of the Sassanian period.The purpose of this article is to investigate the importance and position of the city of Kathah in historical sources and geographical texts. From a descriptive and historical point of view, the place of the Kathah’s name has been studied based on cultures, dictionaries, historical and local texts, and archaeological data have also been used. From a research point of view, he has analyzed the obtained data and compared them with the geographical features of the YazdArdakan plain.The most important questions are: 1. what is the position of the city of Kathah in the sources? 2. Considering the geographical features of the YazdArdakan plain and its adaptation to the descriptions of the texts, which of the settlement centers in this plain can be matched with Kathah? The hypotheses that are raised are: 1. According to the data of local and geographical texts, it is clear that there is no common view of this city between different authors. 2. According to the descriptions of the geographical texts about this city, the Rustaq Dehestan can be matched with Kathah; because geographical texts mention that Kathah was located on the route from Rey to Kerman, which was the most important route to reach the southern and southeastern regions of Iran and was composed of different villages from the very beginning. DiscussionKathah is one of the most important settlements in the Yazd region, which is mentioned in the geographical texts of early Islam period to the middle Ages. Local texts in Yazd date the construction of Kathah to preIslamic times and believe that it was built by Alexander and imprisoned some of Colonel of Darius III in this place. This story is mentioned with slight differences in other local texts and it is believed that after the construction of Yazd, the population will be transferred to Yazd.Local texts also consider to the creation of the city of the Yazd to be related to Sassanian periods, which had a different existence than the city of the Kathah. Although the historical sources do not mention Yazd much, but based on Sassanid coins, this city can be considered one of the mints of this period.According to available sources, Istakhri is the first geographer to mention Kathah as one of the four important cities of Yazd region. Other geographers have similar interpretations of the city. According to their descriptions, the Kathah was composed of different villages from the beginning and was located on one of the important roads in the Yazd region.By regarding the location of Kathah, it should be said that Rustaq is one of the settlements in Yazd district and one of the functions of the central part of Ashkezar city, which consists of different villages, some of which have been developed and turned into cities. Also, this area has been located on the route from the Ray to the Kerman from the beginning and is considered as one of the important agricultural centers in Yazd region. According to archeological data, the history of settlement in this area is related to the preIslamic period, and at least from the Parthian period, archaeological evidence can be seen in this area, and the settlement process continues until the contemporary period. ConclusionThe toponymeis of Yazd and Kathah and the relationship between the two have been one of the topics that have always occupied the minds of researchers in Yazd. Some consider Kathah to be a city built by Alexander and abandoned after the construction of the Yazd, while others believe that the city of Yazd was called Kath in the past.By examining the coins of the Sassanid period, it is clear that the city of Yazd is one of the mints of this period, and based on linguistic data, it is clear that this place referred exclusively to the city of Yazd. The Kathah is also an Arabic word from the root Kathah, which is referred to as one of its settlements due to the presence of sand dunes in the YazdArdakan plain. Therefore, there is no consensus between local and geographical texts regarding Kathah.According to the descriptions of geographical texts, the only settlement area that corresponds to the mentioned descriptions is Rustaq Dehestan. One of the features of this village is the flowing sand hills. Also, the Rustaq from preIslamic times consisted of different villages that had the same area and number of them during different centuries. From an economic point of view, this village is on the way from the Rey to the Kerman, which has led to its development and cultural ties with some areas in the south and south of Iran, on the other hand, the existence of fertile soil has led to agricultural development.
Keywords
 
 

Copyright 2023
Islamic World Science Citation Center
All Rights Reserved