اقتصاد سیاسی تغییرات اقلیمی و چالش های پیش روی بازیگران اصلی

to be able to identify underlying macroeconomic theory that explains technical and managerial response to climate change, a political-economic approach is fundamental because there are deep ideological differences facing this subject. an approach to the development and a sustainable poverty reduction is desired in a new political economic attitude. it has however, been followed by limitations in its implementation and development of many projects. the american-european realistic expression regarding challenges of climate change is naive as they consider them to be more competitive and hegemonic of nature.the u.s believes that multilateral development is not essential and yet, it is the u.s who has the ability to make a unilateral decision and also the power to impose such on others.the paper acknowledges how europe plays the lead in mitigating climate change whilst the us efforts are invested in strengthening its lead in crude oil supply and simultaneously its power to veto climate related decisions made by others.the main question this paper tries to address is, if the rigid realistic view would be able to explain u.s. diplomatic leadership in the field of climate change? the underlying thought behind this paper is that the eu-us diplomatic manoeuvre in this controversy cannot be redirected by us pressure on europe. our argument is based on liberal attitude and particularly the interdependence theory, and it is more likely that the europeans will reserve their superior advantages in terms of strategies and solutions to mitigate climate change