>
Fa   |   Ar   |   En
   standard setting methods in objective structured clinical examination (osce): a comparative study of five methods  
   
نویسنده ansari reshma mohamed ,ab manan norhafizah ,mahat nur ain ,omar norfaizatul shalida ,abdul latiff atikah ,idris sara ,othman azli shahril
منبع journal of medical education development - 2024 - دوره : 17 - شماره : 56 - صفحه:87 -96
چکیده    Background & objective: objective structured clinical examination (osce) is a crucial component in medical school examinations to assess students’ competency, particularly in clinical skills incorporating cognitive and affective domains. osce results are subjected to standard-setting methods, which yield different findings. hence, in this study, five different standard-setting methods, namely norm reference, angoff method, borderline group method (bgm), borderline regression method (brm), and modified cohen’s method, were compared to determine the cut-off scores and failure rates determined by each method.material & methods: data of 170 second-year medical students who attended osce with eight stations for their first professional examination at the end of year 2 mbbs was taken for the study following ethical approval. total scores for each station were standardized to 20 marks, and cut-off scores were determined using each of the five standard-setting methods.results: as a comparison of 5 methods, the norm reference method yielded the highest number of stations with high cut-off scores, followed by brm. this is reflected in the number of failures, too. on the contrary, using the angoff method yielded the lowest cut-off scores in maximum stations, resulting in the least number of failed students. the cochrane’s q test of the results yielded a p < 0.001, which signifies that the proportion of students who failed a particular osce station was significantly different when different methods were used to determine the cut score.conclusion: the study, which compared 5 common standard-setting methods employed in medical education assessments, found that norm-referenced and brm had high cut-off scores and failures, with the opposite determined by the modified angoff method. the study concluded that the cut-off score and failure rate differed with different standard-setting methods, and the choice of the method is contextual depending on the available resources. 
کلیدواژه standard setting ,osce ,angoff ,norm-reference ,borderline group ,borderline regression ,cohen
آدرس international medical school management & science university, medical education department, malaysia, university of cyberjaya, faculty of medicine, department of public health, malaysia, kulliyah of nursing international islamic university, malaysia, manipal university college malaysia, department of biochemistry, malaysia, university of cyberjaya, faculty of medicine, department of anatomy, malaysia, university of cyberjaya, faculty of medicine, department of anatomy, malaysia, national defence university malaysia, faculty of medicine and defence health, department of pharmacology, malaysia
پست الکترونیکی azli.shahril@upnm.edu.my
 
     
   
Authors
  
 
 

Copyright 2023
Islamic World Science Citation Center
All Rights Reserved