تبیین اثر پذیری سرزندگی محله های شهری از ابعاد دلبستگی مکانی نمونه مورد مطالعه: شهر اهواز

دستیابی به مکان‌های سرزنده و پویا همواره یکی از دغدغه های مهم برنامه‌ریزان، طراحان و مدیران شهری بوده است. این مفهوم در محله‌های شهری که به‌دلیل تداوم حضور ساکنان، کیفیت روابط انسان-مکان و انسان-انسان در سطوح بالاتری شکل می گیرد، متاثر از عوامل مرتبط با پیوند انسان با مکان زیست خود، نظیر دلبستگی مکانی، است. این پژوهش تاثیر مفهوم چندبعدی دلبستگی مکانی و ابعاد آن بر سرزندگی محله‌های شهری را بررسی می‌کند. روش تحقیق آمیخته (کیفی-کمی) و ازنظر هدف کاربردی است. در بخش کیفی، ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات مصاحبه‌‌ی نیمه‌سازمان‌یافته و روش تحلیل کدگذاری و تقلیل چهارمرحله‌ای مفاهیم بوده است که درنتیجه، 17 مولفه و 5 بعد برای متغیر دلبستگی مکانی استخراج شد. در بخش کمی، داده‌ها ازطریق پرسشنامه گردآوری و تحلیل داده‌ها ازطریق نرم‌افزارspss و ترسیم معادله‌ی ساختاری روابط متغیرها در نرم‌افزارamos graphic انجام شده است. نتایج بخش کمی‌ضمن تایید برازش مدل طراحی‌شده‌ی متغیرهای اصلی پژوهش (مقدار χ2/df=4.908 و rmsea= 0.100)، اثر مستقیم و معنادار دلبستگی مکانی بر سرزندگی شهری را تایید می‌کند (ضریب استاندارد مسیر 0.806 و ضریب معناداری کمتر از 0.0001). همچنین، مدل اثرات مستقیم ابعاد پنج‌گانه‌ی دلبستگی مکانی بر سرزندگی شهری، اثر مستقیم ابعاد هویت مکانی، پیوندهای عاطفی‌شناختی و وابستگی مکانی بر سرزندگی محله های شهری را تایید می‌کند و نشان می‌دهد که هویت مکانی موثرترین بعد تاثیرگذار دلبستگی مکانی بر سرزندگی محله های شهری است.

Explaining the effectiveness of urban neighborhoods vitality among place attachment dimensions, Case study: Ahvaz city

IntroductionAchieving dynamic and vibrant locations has always been one of the major concerns of planners, designers and city managers. This concept in urban neighborhoods, formed at higher levels due to the continued presence of inhabitants as well as the quality of humanlocation and humanhuman relations, is influenced by the factors associated with human connection with its residential place, such as place attachment. This case study examines the effect of the multidimensional concept of place attachment and its dimension on the vitality of urban neighborhoods.So the questions of research are:What is the effect of place attachment of residents on vitality of Ahvaz city neighborhoods?Which component of place attachment has more effect on vitality of Ahvaz city neighborhoods?MethodologyThe method used in the study is a mixed research method (qualitativequantitative) and practical in terms of purpose. In the qualitative section, the data gathering tool was a semiorganized interview with 26 people including 14 women and 12 men and a coding analysis method along with a fourstep reduction of concepts. In the quantitative part, data was collected through a questionnaire, and data analysis was carried out using SPSS software and drawing the structural equation of variables rsquo; relationships within Amos Graphic software. Statistical society was Ahvaz city residents and sample size was 392 respondents that had completed in selected neighborhood (BaghSheykh and KianAbad) based on randomized population balancing method (respectively 101 and 291 questionnaire).Results and discussionIn the first step, qualitative semiorganized interview resulted in 17 components and 5 dimensions for the place attachment variable. Quantitative part of research shows that all 5 analyzed components of place attachment are greater than supposed average (3) and the lowest amount is for place dependence. Residents analysis of neighborhoods vitality is significantly greater than supposed average and in BaghSheykh neighborhood, it is greater a little more than KianAbad, although this difference is in not statistically significant. While confirming the fit of the designed model of the main research variables (value chi;^2 frasl;df =4.908 RMSEA= 0.100), also, the results of the quantitative part supports the direct and significant impact of place attachment on urban vitality (the standard coefficient of the route is 0.806 and the significance coefficient is less than 0.0001). Also, the direct effects model of fivefold dimension of place attachment on urban vitality, confirms the direct effect of place identity dimensions, emotionalcognitive connection, and place dependence on the vitality of urban neighborhoods; showing that place identity is the most effective dimension of place attachment concerning urban vitality.ConclusionThis research confirmed the positive effect of place attachment of residents on vitality of Ahvaz city neighborhoods and showed that place identity is the most important effective component of place attachment on vitality of Ahvaz city neighborhoods. So, in general, since forming of vitality in urban neighborhoods is connected with place and affected by placebase communities, yet vitality is one of components of urban spaces qualities, so this concept is related with qualities of peopleplace links such as place attachment.