تبیین ارتباط مکانی بین قابلیت پیاده‌‌مداری ذهنی و عینی محلات شهری (نمونه موردی: مناطق4، 8 و 13 شهر تهران)

هدف این تحقیق کشف ترجیحات مردم نسبت به فضاهای پیاده‌‌مدار و سنجش قابلیت پیاده‌‌مداری ذهنی و عینی و تبیین ارتباط مکانی آنها در محلات مناطق4، 8 و 13 شهر تهران است. این پژوهش از نظر روش‌شناسی در دستۀ تحقیقات توصیفی و اکتشافی قرار دارد که با رهیافت پژوهش‌‌های کمی انجام شده است. از داده های سرشماری، کاربری زمین، شبکه ارتباطی و داده‌‌های حاصل از نظرسنجی بهره گرفته شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر کلیه جمعیت و همه محلات مناطق 22 گانه شهر تهران است. نمونه‌‌های آماری آن که به روش هدفمند انتخاب شدند شامل 31 محله هستند. یافته‌‌های این تحقیق در ارتباط با ترجیحات مردم نسبت به فضاهای پیاده‌‌مدار همسو با سایر تحقیقات بوده است و ساکنان شهر تهران در ارتباط با موضوع پیاده‌‌روی همانند مردمان سایر نقاط دنیا فضاهای دارای دسترسی مناسب به خدمات، امکانات و زیرساخت‌‌های مورد نیاز زندگی روزمره، محیط‌‌های ایمن، جذاب، سرزنده، شاداب، عاری از آلودگی و ترافیک، وجود فضاهای مناسب و تعریف شده برای پیاده‌‌روی را برای پیاده‌‌روی مناسب می‌‌دانند. یافته‌‌ها در ارتباط با شکاف بین پیاده‌‌مداری عینی و ذهنی نشان داد که به غیر از مولفه مکان‌‌هایی برای پیاده‌‌روی و دوچرخه‌‌سواری بقیه ابعاد مطالعه شده از جمله مدت زمان دسترسی به مغازه‌‌ها یا فروشگاه‌‌ها، تسهیلات و غیره، دسترسی به خدمات؛ خیابان‌‌های محله؛ محیط محله؛ امنیت ادارک شده از ترافیک؛ امنیت ادارک شده از جرم؛ و میران رضایت از محله در ارتباط با سنجش پیاده‌‌مداری ذهنی میانگین بالاتری در محلات با پیاده‌‌مداری عینی بالا در مقایسه با محلات با قابلیت پیاده‌‌مداری عینی پایین داشته‌‌اند.

Explaining the spatial association between the objective and perceived walkability of urban neighborhoods (Case study: districts of 4, 8 and 13 of Tehran city)

Extended AbstractIntroductionA large number of researches demonstrated that built environment attributes affect the walking and cycling for transportation (Ewing Cervero, 2010; Bauman et al., 2012). Studies examining the potential effect of the built environment on physical activity have employed objective and/or perceived (selfreport) measures to assess characteristics of the neighborhood environment. Findings illustrated people who live in neighborhoods with traditional or walkable designs report about 30 minutes more walking for transportation each week and more total physical activity, compared to those who live in neighborhoods with less walkable suburban designs (Frank, et al., 2006). Therefore, the association between the built environment and walking activity are complicated due to spatial heterogeneity, selfselection issues such as attitudes and perceptions on walking behavior, and methodological differences (Lee, et al., 2017). Some evidence shows that residents rsquo; selfreports of their neighborhood environment may be less revealing than are objective assessments. However, other studies suggest that perceived neighborhood environment exerts a unique effect and may be a more telling indicator for individual health than objective neighborhood characteristics (Wen et al., 2006). So, the aim of this research is discovering the preferences of the residence towards the walkable spaces and explaining spatial association of the perceived and objective measures of neighborhood walkability in district of 4, 8 and 13 of Tehran.MethodologyThis research is a descriptive and exploratory research that has been conducted with quantitative research approach. In this regard, GIS software were used to mapping the neighborhood walkability criteria. Network analyst functions, also, was used in order to service area determination and accessibility to public services. Exploratory factor analysis and multiple regression were cooperatively employed with regard to reduce the set of variables and extract variables that explain the objective and perceived measures of neighborhoods walkability at a 95% confidence interval in Tehran metropolitan. In relation to perceived measure of neighborhoods walkability, we used the standard questionnaire developed by Saelens et al. (2002), as well as Cerin et al. (2006), has been developed as Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS). The questionnaire has the following dimensions: Time taken to get from residence home to the nearest businesses or facilities, Access to services, Streets condition or quality in the neighborhood, Places for walking and cycling, Neighborhood surroundings, Safety from traffic, Safety from crime neighborhood satisfaction. In the present study for each neighborhood, walkability index, which is the sum of the standard Z score of four urban form metrics, is defined as a function of net residential density (ratio of the number of residential units to residential areas in each neighborhood per hectare), sum of the ratio of floor area of retail units to their parcels in each neighborhood, Landuse mix index (entropy coefficient) and street connectivity (Number of intersections with 3 or more legs per km2). Also, census data, land use and road layers and survey data were used. The statistical population of the present study is the population of all districts of the 22 districts of Tehran. The statistical samples which selected by purposeful method were 31 neighborhoods.Results and discussionFindings revealed that the gap between the objective and the perceived walkability, except the component of walking and cycling places, the rest of the studied dimensions, including the time of access to shops or stores, facilities, etc., access to services; neighborhood streets; neighborhood environment; perceived security of traffic and crime; and the satisfaction of the neighborhood in relation to subjective pedestrian assessment have a higher mean in neighborhoods with high objective walkability compared to those with low walkable neighborhoods. Research findings in regard to the people preferences about the walkable spaces are in line with other studies. Residents of our case study in connection with the issue of walking, as well as people from other parts of the world, prefer spaces with appropriate access to services, facilities and infrastructure needed for everyday life, and safe, attractive, lively and free of contamination and traffic environments as well as welldefined spaces for walking. The point that needs to be mentioned is the population density, the density of residential units, as well as the density of activities (commercial and service as well as offices or administrative activities). In most previous investigations, mainly in link to walking, built environment with urban sprawl form are compared to more compact cities or socalled smart cities with mixed and diverse land uses, and the result is typically that urban environments which have a dense and smart urban form that are high in density of population, activity and residential are reported proper for walking behavior. In this regard, although the urban form of the studied neighborhoods of this research compared to many previous case studies in terms of those variables, is still more compact, according to the participants rsquo; opinion, they prefer to walkability of their residential spaces, neighborhoods that have diverse land uses (cloth stores, food markets, supermarkets, juices and ice cream shops, home appliances malls and etc.), as well as green and open spaces and environments that have more attractive facets.ConclusionIn order to achieve the appropriate developmental model to increase the subjective and objective walkability of urban neighborhoods, some steps must be taken to increase the green and public open spaces and redistribute the land uses in accordance with the urban smart growth pattern, by through less dependence on the personal car usage, many challenges of Tehran metropolitan will reduce in line with sustainable development.