تحلیلی بر دیدگاه علامه طباطبایی و جوادی آملی در مسئله عالم ذرّ با تکیه بر مبانی ملاصدرا

Discourse about the world of descendants is always accompanied by two questions: the place of the descendant’s world in the existence system? and why does no human remember this covenant (compact)? there have been several answers to these two questions, and the answers of allameh tabataba’i and javadi amoli are more accurate and important. the library method has been used in this article, and we have tried to refer to the primary sources of theorists of this issue. the answer of allameh tabataba’i and javadi amoli is that they are initially opposed to each other. in this article, while examining the answers of these two thinkers, it is clear that the theory of nature of javadi amoli solves problems better and easier. in the following, according to mullā ṣadrā’s innovations in the topics of transcendent theosophy, such as the issue of separation of existence and “simplicity of the truth of all things” (arabic: بسیط الحقیقة کلّ الاشیاء) and especially rarefied and real predication, it is clear that the theory of innate natural disposition (nature) is complementary and compatible with the theory of collective existence.

An Analysis of the Views of Allameh Tabataba’i and Javadi Amoli on the Issue of the World of Descendants Based on the Fundamentals of Mullā Ṣadrā

Islamic philosophy, with its foundations of ontology (ontological), has established the most basic foundations of rational theology. Uncertainty and gradation in these principles inflicts irreparable damage on theology in a special (more peculiar) sense and transforms it into another path with transformative consequences. Principality of existence has a prominent, visible and irreplaceable role among all the central principles of ontology. Transcendent Wisdom has established this principle by recognizing its effective role. Opponents of it have, as a result of some inconsistencies results with their presuppositions, such as the unity of existence, distorted and induced doubt in its proofs. The main doubt is the accusation of circle doubt and circular reasoning by a seemingly heterogeneous spectrum, including antiphilosophers and some separatists (gradationists) in a polemical method. In this opportunity, attention will be paid to four reasons that are in this doubt. These reasons are: the argument of the goodness of existence, the argument based on the difference between the effects of external existence and the mental existence, the argument based on the refusal (impossibility) of doubt in gradation the quiddity and the argument of intensified (intensifying) motion. By presenting the contents of these arguments, the content of the doubt will also be tested against them. The analysis shows that the skepticism is due to insufficient attention to the principles of these arguments.