بررسی واقعیت روان‌شناختی سلسله‌مراتب گواه‌نمایی در فارسی به هنگام ادراک شنیداری جمله

پرسش اصلی این تحقیق واقعیت روان‌شناختی سلسله‌مراتب گواه‌نمایی در فارسی است که از مستقیم (دیداری) شروع می‌شود و به غیرمستقیم (نقل‌قول، استنتاج، استنباط و غیره) ختم می‌شود. در این پژوهش با به‌کارگیری روش تصمیم‌گیری واژگانی بیناحسی سعی شده است که نحوۀ پردازش جمله‌های حاوی عناصر گواه‌نما با برنامۀ نرم‌افزاری dmdx بررسی شود. چارچوب نظری تحقیق مبتنی بر رمزگان چندبخشی/ چندگانه است؛ بدین معنی که نوع حواس درگیر به هنگام درک و تولید زبان در بازنمودهای زبانی موثر است. متغیر مستقل نوع گواه‌نما و متغیر وابسته زمان واکنش آزمودنی‌ها به محرک دیداری است. آزمودنی‌ها سی نفر دانشجوی 20 تا 22 ساله بوده‌اند که در دو گروه مرد و زن مرتب شده‌اند. نتیجۀ آزمون این است که در سلسله‌مراتب گواه‌نمایی در فارسی جمله‌های حاوی گواه‌نماهای مستقیم دیداری به‌طور معناداری دیرتر از دیگر انواع آن پردازش می‌شوند و گواه‌نماهای غیرمستقیم از بقیه سریع‌تر. تفاوت معنا‌داری میان زمان پردازش جمله‌های حاوی گواه‌نماهای حسی و غیرحسی دیده می‌شود. توجیه و توضیح این امر را می‌توان در فعال‌شدگی بخش‌های بیشتر در کورتکس به هنگام بازنمود و پردازش تصاویر ذهنی دیداری دانست که علاوه ‌بر »حافظه « به »توجه « بیشتر نیازمند است. این درحالی است که استنتاج به نواحی کم‌تری از لب فرانتال محدود است. نتایج واقعیت روان‌شناختی سلسله‌مراتب گواه‌نمایی فارسی را تایید می کند. از حیث بار شناختی تحمیل‌شده بر مغز، می‌توان در یک تقسیم‌بندی کلی گواه‌نماهای فارسی را به دو دسته حسی و غیرحسی دسته‌بندی کرد. هدف از این پژوهش به‌آزمون نهادن واقعیت سلسله‌مراتبی است که بیشتر در مبحث گواه‌نمایی ارائه می‌شود. این آزمون به شیوه‌ای تجربی تدوین و ارائه شده است.

The Psychological Reality of Evidentiality Hierarchy in Persian during Sentence Listening Comprehension

The main question of this inquiry is the psycholinguistic reality of evidentiality hierarchy arranged from direct(witnessed) to indirect (reported, inferred, argued, etc). This study investigates processing of sentences containing evidentials by the crossmodal lexical decision method run by DMDX software. The theoretical framework is mainly based on episodic processing in which mental representations of linguistic items are not as abstract as it seems, but it is subject to the sensory input by which the representation is formed. The independent variable is evidential type and the dependent one is the subjectschr('39') reaction times to the visual stimuli. Subjects were 30 university students aging 20 to 22 classified into two groups of male and female. As for the results, they show that in Persian along evidentiality hierarchy, sentences containing direct witnessed evidentials are processed later and longer than the second hand inferred evidential, besides the fact that there is a significant difference between sensory and nonsensory/ second hand evidentials. The explanation is that processing a direct evidential needs much more cortical activation areas like memory and attention leading to much more cognitive load than inference which is limited just to frontal lobe. Findings approve the psychological reality of this theoretical hierarchy in Persian classifying them into direct/sensory and indirect/nonsensory evidentials. The aim is to examine the psychological reality of evidentiality hierarchy experimentally. 1. IntroductionDifferent linguists have proposed different definitions for examining the psychological reality of various theoretical linguistic issues. This study investigates processing of sentences containing different types of evidentials of Persian by the crossmodal lexical decision method. This psycholinguistic method has been used classically by Shapiro (1990) to estimate the cognitive load across the mind. The main question of this inquiry is the psycholinguistic reality of evidential complexity hierarchy. The theoretical framework is mainly based on episodic processing in which mental representations of linguistic items are not as abstract as it seems, but it is subject to the sensory input by which the representation is formed. Also the classification of Omidvari and Golfam. (2017) on evidentials has been applied here. They divided Persian evidentials in to two broad categories of direct and indirect analyzed in detail.32. Literature ReviewThe method used in this research is the cross modal lexical decision method, which will be detailed due to its importance. Theoretical framework applied here is that of Shapiro (1990) in psycholinguistics. Independent variable is the type of Persian evidentials used in the verb form and the dependent variable is subjectsˈ reaction times. 30 students of universities aged 1830 participated in this study. The results of two experiments show that the psychological reality of the complexity of representation of Persian evidentials according to Persian data is confirmed and there is a significant difference between the processing time of sentences containing different types of Persian evidentials . 3. MethodologyIt was found out that Persian has two types of evidentials: direct and indirect. The theoretical framework is mainly based on episodic processing in which mental representations of linguistic items are not as abstract as it seems, but it is subject to the sensory input by which the representation is formed. The independent variable is evidential type and the dependent one is the subjectschr('39') reaction times to the visual stimuli. Subjects were 30 university students aging 20 to 22 classified into two groups of male and female. 4. ConclusionAs for the results, they show that in Persian along evidentiality hierarchy, sentences containing direct witnessed evidentials are processed later and longer than the second hand inferred evidential, besides the fact that there is a significant difference between sensory and nonsensory/ second hand evidentials.The explanation suitable for the found results is that processing a direct evidential needs much more cortical activation areas like memory and attention leading to much more cognitive load than inference which is limited just to frontal lobe. Findings approve the psychological reality of this theoretical hierarchy in Persian classifying them into direct/sensory and indirect/nonsensory evidentials. As the aim was to examine the psychological reality of evidentiality hierarchy experimentallythe results showed the psychological reality.