آهنگ پاره‌گفتارهای پرسشی در زبان فارسی

تحقیق حاضر به مقایسۀ منحنی آهنگ پاره گفتارهای خبری و پرسشی فارسی بر حسبِ الگوی تغییرات آهنگیِ تکیه های زیروبمی پیش هسته و هسته و نواحی مرزی پاره گفتار می پردازد. پیشینۀ مطالعات آهنگِ فارسی نشان داده است که برای تغییرات فرکانس پایه در مرز پایانی پاره گفتارهای خبری به صورت نزولی و پاره گفتارهای پرسشی به صورت صعودی است. به علاوه اشاره شده است که سطح ارتفاع قلۀ تکیۀ زیروبمی هسته و دامنۀ زیروبمی صدا در آهنگ پرسشی به طور قابل توجهی از آهنگ خبری بالاتر است. هدف از انجام تحقیق حاضر، پاسخ گویی به این پرسش بود که چه تفاوت های آهنگی بین پاره گفتارهای خبری و پرسشی در نواحی مهم منحنی آهنگ گفتار شامل تکیۀ زیروبمی پیش هسته، تکیۀ زیروبمی هسته، نواخت کناری و نواخت مرزنما وجود دارد. برای این منظور از روش شناسی واج شناسی آزمایشگاهی استفاده شد. نتایج به دست آمده نشان داد که ساخت نواختیِ منحنی f0 در فاصلۀ بین تکیۀ زیروبمی هسته و مرز پایانی منحنی در پاره گفتارهای خبری به صورت ll% و در پاره گفتارهای پرسشی به صورت lh% است. همچنین، این نتایج نشان داد که تفاوت های آهنگی بین پاره گفتارهای خبری و پرسشی محدود به نواحی پایانی منحنی آهنگ گفتار نمی شود و این پاره گفتارها از نظر الگوی سطح ارتفاع قله و درۀ f0 تکیۀ زیروبمی هسته و پیش هسته نیز با هم متفاوت اند.

Intonation of Questions in Persian

The present paper aims at comparing the intonation of Persian statements and questions in terms of the pitch scaling of tonal events in Prenuclear and nuclear prosodic positions as well as utterance final position. Previous research suggest that the direction of the sentencefinal fundamental frequency (F0) movement is the most salient intonational cue to questions and statements in Persian. Prototypical yes/no questions are often characterized by a high F0 rise (H%) whereas statements have a terminal F0 fall (L%). It has also been suggested that the H tone of the nuclear pitch accent as well as the pitch range is higher in questions than statements. The present study explored the question as to what extent the prenuclear, nuclear and boundary tones may contribute to tune meaning in Persian, thereby distinguishing between statements and questions. The research methodology was the one used in laboratory phonology. The results showed that the tonal structure of the F0 contour between the nuclear pitch accent and the end of the utterance is different in the two sentence type: statements are characterized by LL% while questions are characterized by LH%. The results further suggested that the differences between statement and question intonation are not limited to boundary tones as the pitch scaling of both the L and the H tones of prenuclear and nuclear pitch accents are also different in the two sentence types1. IntroductionThe present paper aims at comparing the intonation of Persian statements and questions in terms of the pitch scaling of tonal events in Prenuclear and nuclear prosodic positions as well as utterance final position. Previous research suggests that the direction of the sentencefinal fundamental frequency (F0) movement is the most salient intonational cue to questions and statements in Persian. Prototypical yes/no questions are often characterized by a high F0 rise (H%) whereas statements have a terminal F0 fall (L%). It has also been suggested that the H tone of the nuclear pitch accent as well as the pitch range is higher in questions than statements.Recent studies on other languages have shown that an utterancefinal rise is not mandatory for the distinction of questions from statements, and that question and statement cues are not restricted to the intonational nucleus. For example, Face (2007) showed for Castilian Spanish that higher prenuclear F0 peaks are able to change the listeners rsquo; interpretation of a sentence from statement to question. Petrone and Niebuhr (2013) found for German questions that listeners could accurately identify sentence mode before listening to the terminal F0 movement. They used the shape, slope, and alignment differences of the preceding prenuclear accents preceding the final rises as a perceptual cue for question identification. In Neapolitan Italian, Petrone and D rsquo;Imperio (2008) and Petrone (2008) found that the F0 section between the nuclear and the preceding prenuclear accent varies according to sentence mode. In statements, the F0 after the prenuclear rise falls rapidly to the end of the accented prosodic word, creating a low plateaulike turning point. Conversely, in questions, the F0 fall after the prenuclear rise is shallower, so that the F0 contour takes a concave shape.The present study explored the question as to what extent the prenuclear, nuclear and edge tones may contribute to tune meaning in Persian, thereby distinguishing between statements and questions. Based on the findings for IndoGermanic languages, it was hypothesized that the F0 contours of statements and questions are not only different in the nuclear region but also different in the nonfinal prenuclear zones. The research methodology was the one used in laboratory phonology. A corpus of 72 sentences was designed to test the hypothesis. The speakers (12 male and 12 female) read the test sentences on a computer screen. They were instructed to read each sentence naturally, with no special emphasis on any part of the sentence. The target sentences were recorded on DAT recorder using a high quality unidirectional headmounted microphone (Shure SM58) in a sound proof booth. The recorded sentences were digitized at a sampling rate of 16 kHz. They were analyzed using the acoustic speech analysis software Praat (version 4.3.01; Boersma Weenink, 2005). All the measurements were made on simultaneous visual displays of waveform, wideband spectrogram and f0 tracks. The following segmental and f0 landmarks were identified in each utterance: beginning of the consonant of the accented syllable in each accentual phrase; F0 minimum and F0 maximum in each accentual phrase and utterancefinal F0. The results showed that the tonal structure of the F0 contour between the nuclear pitch accent and the end of the utterance is different in the two sentence types: statements are characterized by LL% while questions are characterized by LH%. The results further suggested that differences between statement and question intonation are not limited to boundary tones as the pitch scaling of both the L and the H tones of prenuclear and nuclear pitch accents are also different in the two sentence types. This finding thus may run against the lsquo;nuclear rsquo; tide, providing evidence that the prenuclear contour does contribute to tune meaning. The results suggest that prenuclear accents do not obey only to rhythmic constraints. Rather, they can make a separate contribution to the meaning of the whole tune. The findings reported here agree with those of other studies which pointed out that the prenuclear F0 contour might contain cues for the question versus statement distinctio