حافظه، روایت و بحران هویتی ممتد در ایران پس از انقلاب

دوﻟﺖ ﻫﺎ در اﯾﺮان ﭘﺴﺎ اﻧﻘﻼﺑﯽ ﺑﺮای ﻣﺸﺮوﻋﯿﺖ ﺑﺨﺸﯽ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮد از ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻫﺎی ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ای و ﺑﻪوﯾﮋه ﺑﺮای ﺑﺎزﺳﺎزی ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ از ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖ ﻫﺎی ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ در رﺳﺎﻧﻪ، آﻣﻮزش وﭘﺮورش و ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎی ﺷﻬﺮی ﺑﻬﺮه ﺑﺮده اﻧﺪ. رواﯾﺎت اﻓﺮاد در ﻧﺴﻞ ﻫﺎی ﭘﺴﺎ اﻧﻘﻼﺑﯽ ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽ دﻫﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻫﺎی ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ای ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺗﻐﯿﯿﺮات ﻫﻮﯾﺘﯽ و ﺷﮑﻞ ﮔﯿﺮی ﻫﻮﯾﺖ ﻫﺎی ﺳﺘﯿﺰه ﺟﻮ و ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺤﻪ ﺟﻮ ﺷﺪه اﻧﺪ. در اﯾﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺮه ﮔﯿﺮی از روش ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ رواﯾﺖ ﻓﻮﮐﻮﯾﯽ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﻫﺎی ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ را ﺑﺮ ﻫﻮﯾﺖ ﺑﺨﺸﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ دوم و ﻧﺴﻞ ﭘﺴﺎﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﯿﻢ ﻧﺴﻞ دوم ﮐﻪ ﺑﻪ واﺳﻄﻪ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﻣﺴﺘﻘﯿﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺴﻞ اﻧﻘﻼﺑﯽ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ را ﺑﻪ ﯾﺎد ﻣﯽ آورد در ﺟﺮﯾﺎن ﻫﻮﯾﺖ ﯾﺎﺑﯽ از ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖ ﻫﺎی ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ در دوره ﻫﺎی ﺳﺎزﻧﺪﮔﯽ و اﺻﻼﺣﺎت رواﯾﺖ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﻨﺪ. اﯾﻦ رواﯾﺎت دﯾﻨﺎﻣﯿﮏ ﺳﺘﯿﺰه ﺟﻮﯾﯽ و ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺤﻪ ﺟﻮﯾﯽ در اﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎت اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ اﯾﻦ دوران را ﺑﺮﺷﮑﻞ دﻫﯽ ﻓﺮاﻣﻮﺷﯽ ﮔﺰﯾﻨﺸﯽ ﯾﺎ ﺗﺠﻮﯾﺰی ﻧﻘﺸﯽ ﻣﺸﻬﻮد ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﺪ. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﻧﺴﻞ ﭘﺴﺎﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﮐﻪ از ﻃﺮﯾﻖ واﺳﻄﻪ ﻫﺎی ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ ﺑﻪ درﮐﯽ از ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ رﺳﯿﺪه اﻧﺪ ﺳﯿﺮ ﻫﻮﯾﺘﯽ ﺧﻮد را ﺑﺤﺮاﻧﯽ و ﻫﻮﯾﺖ ﻣﻠﯽ را ﻣﺨﺪوش ﻣﯽ ﺑﯿﻨﻨﺪ. وﺿﻌﯿﺖ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﯽ در ﻧﺴﻞ ﭘﺴﺎﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﺑﻪ واﺳﻄﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻧﺴﻠﯽ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺴﻞ اﻧﻘﻼﺑﯽ ﮐﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﯽ ﺷﻮد و اﻫﻤﯿﺖ ﻧﻬﺎد ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﻫﺎ در ﻫﻮﯾﺖ ﻣﻠﯽ ﺷﺎن رﻧﮓ ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎزد. ﺑﺤﺮان ﻫﻮﯾﺘﯽ در اﯾﻦ ﻧﺴﻞ ﻫﺎ ﻧﺸﺌﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ از اﻣﺘﺪاد وﺿﻌﯿﺖ ﺗﺮوﻣﺎﺗﯿﮏ وﻟﯽ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﯽ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺪاوم ﻫﻮﯾﺖ ﯾﺎﺑﯽ ﺳﺘﯿﺰه ﺟﻮﺳﺖ. ﺑﺮ اﯾﻦ ﻣﺒﻨﺎ ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻇﻬﻮر و ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺪﯾﺪ ﺑﺤﺮان ﻫﻮﯾﺘﯽ در ﻧﺴﻞ ﻫﺎی ﭘﺴﺎاﻧﻘﻼﺑﯽ ﻣﻨﻮط ﺑﻪ درﯾﺎﻓﺘﯽ از ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﯿﺎن ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ و اﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎت اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ در دوران ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ اﺳﺖ.

memory, narrative and protracted identity conflict in post-revolutionary iran

memory politics in post-revolutionary iran had been the main element in formation of national identity. post-revolutionary governments using the politicising of memory invent new discourses and expand it for its own legitimation and transcending the reconciled identities. yet, these politicisation have been non-functional.the dominant memory cultures in post-revolutionary iran destroyed the relation between memory and identity and made the remembering of revolution ambiguous.second generation one of the kinds of post-revolutionary generations using the communicative memory for remembering the past and post-memory generation the ones which indeed connect to the traumatic past through cultural memory have faced politicised memory through the effects of institutional memory.in other occasions, politics of memory have been applied to demonstrate part of the past, causing the formation of situated silences, prescribed forgetfulness(amnesia) or staying in victimhood witch will result in contested identities. narratives of past in in theses generations manifest the elements involved in formation of contest and the applications on compromisation.since then the contests in post revolutionary groups and its diversity in formation of silences or protests, ends up in protracrted identity conflict and successes or failure of a nation-states.