افشانش معنا در دو داستان «بر دار کردن حسنک وزیر» و «وضع اریارق و غازی» به روایت بیهقی

از جمله دیدگاه هایی که در باب تاریخ بیهقی مطرح است، اعتقاد به تاریخی بودن این اثر و برجسته بودن جنبه‌ تاریخی آن است. بر اساس این دیدگاه جنبه های ادبی تاریخ بیهقی نادیده گرفته می شود از آن جهت که هدف و ملاک نویسنده را روایت تاریخ دانسته اند. از آنجا که بیهقی در روایت خود از تاریخ به گزینش دست می زند و همه‌ حوادث و رویدادها را روایت نمی کند، در واقع می توان گفت ایدئولوژی و نگاه خاص بیهقی نیز در اثر او تاثیر گذاشته است. در این راستا امکان معناهای متعدد در جملات بیهقی و آنچه از روایت او حذف شده است، مطرح می شود. نگارندگان با تاکید بر دو عنصر گزینش در مکالمه و گزینش در توصیف امکانات غیاب معنا را در «بر دار کردن حسنک وزیر» و «وضع اریارق و غازی» از تاریخ بیهقی با روش تحلیلی- توصیفی بررسی کرده اند و به این نتیجه رسیده اند که بیهقی با به کارگیری تمهیداتی چون گزینش در مکالمات میان افراد، تاکید بر جنبه های نحوی، توصیف ویژگی های اشخاص و بیان عواطف در روایت خود، امکان برداشت های متعدد و کامل ناپذیر بودن معناها را ایجاد می کند.

dissemination of meaning in hanging hasnak vazir of beyhaqi history

among the opinions that are raised about the history of beyhaqi, is the belief in the historicity of this work and the prominence of its historical aspect. according to these literary views, beyhaqi’s history is ignored because they consider the purpose and criterion of the author to be the narration of history. since beyhaqi is selective in his narration of history and does not narrate all the incidents and events, in fact, it can be said that beyhaqi’s ideology and special perspective also influenced his work. in this regard, many possibilities are raised in bayhaghi’s sentences and what was omitted from his narration. emphasizing the two elements of selection in the conversation and selection in the description of the possibilities of the presence of meaning, the authors have analyzed the history of beyhaqi with analytical-descriptive method in &taking hasnak vazir& and have come to the conclusion that beyhaqi by using measures because selection in conversations between people, emphasis on syntactic aspects, describing the characteristics of people and expressing emotions in their narrative, creates the possibility of multiple interpretations and the incompleteness of meanings.keywords: derrida, presence of meaning, beyhaqi, history of beyhaqi, hasnak vazir.introductionthe absence of meaning, also referred to as the dispersal of meaning, refers to the endlessness of meanings or the missing part of meaning that is not present in the text. among these, the history of beyhaqi is a text that, due to its historical nature, creates the impression in the audience that they are facing a historical text. the narrator of history, namely beyhaqi, continuously weaves a narrative to convey a singular meaning to the audience. however, through the presence of three components: 1. the selection of beyhaqi’s personal emotional actions and the description of individual emotions, 2. attention to the structure and the horizontal axis of sentence coordination to express secondary concepts, and 3. the selection of narrating an event from various perspectives and through different individuals, the statements made by beyhaqi result in an absence of meaning, meaning that a part of the meaning remains hidden in the underlying layers of the history of beyhaqi.