بررسی تصحیح لطائف ‌التفسیر زاهد درواجکی؛ نمونۀ موردی سورۀ صافّات

لطائف‌ التفسیر از تفاسیر کهن و کامل فارسی است که این سال‌ها توسّط خانم سعیده کمائی‌فرد و به همّت موسّسه میراث مکتوب و عمدتاً بر پایۀ استفاده از دو نسخه به زیور چاپ آراسته و در پنج جلد منتشر شده است. بنای این نوشتار بر آن است که دربارۀ تصحیح این اثر با تکیه بر تصحیح سورۀ صافّات، نظر خود را اعلام کند. گزینش این نمونه، کاملاً، اتّفاقی بوده و حجم نسبتاً مناسب سوره و تنوّع مسائل مطرح‌شده در آن و افتادگی نسخۀ اساس در نیمۀ پایانی سوره در انتخاب سوره بی‌تاثیر نبوده است. نویسندگان این نوشته بر این باورند که کاستی‌های متنوّعی در تصحیح این اثر رخ داده، این کاستی‌ها را عمدتاً به دو دستۀ «صوری» و «محتوایی» می‌توان دسته‌بندی کرد. مقاله شواهد و یا به‌عبارتی مستندات مربوط به هر دسته را از متن بیرون کشیده، در جای مناسب آن قرار داده و بنای کار را بر اختصار و تکیه بر بدخوانی‌هایِ قطعی گذاشته است. تنگی فضای مقاله پرداختن به علل کامل بدخوانی‌ها را سلب کرده و زمینه را بر اشارۀ کوتاه به آن علّت‌ها فراهم کرده است. نتیجه‌ای که از این گفتار حاصل می‌شود این است که تصحیح مجدّد لطائف‌التفسیر، کاملاً، محسوس است؛ امّا در صورتی هم ‌که دربارۀ روایی یک سوره نسبت به تمام تفسیر تردیدی باشد، دلایل محکم و معتبر دیگری در حوزۀ تصحیح از قبیل کنارگذاشتن نسخه‌بدل قدیمی متعلّق به آستان قدس رضوی، در اختیار نداشتن نسخۀ کامل و خوش‌خط مربوط به کتابخانۀ ابوریحان بیرونی تاشکند، عدم مراجعۀ مصحّح به متون کهن تفسیری و لغوی و بدخوانی‌های ناشی از کم‌توجّهی به سیاق و بافت کلام، مخاطب را به سوی چنین باوری سوق می‌دهد.

an investigation into the corrected version of zahed darwajeki’s lataif al-tafsir: case study of chapter saffat

lataif al-tafsir is one of the most ancient and complete persian commentaries, published by mrs. saeedeh kamaifard with the help of miras maktoub institute. the commentary is in five volumes and based on two versions. this study tried to examine the corrections of this commentary, focusing on chapter saffat of the holy quran. this chapter was selected as it is among the middle chapters of the quran, its size is big enough to be explored, it includes various issues, and ignoring the original version in the second half of this chapter. the researchers believe that the commentary has various shortcomings and categorized them into “form” and “content” shortcomings. many witnesses pertaining to any of the categories were identified in the text. succinctness and incontrovertible misreadings were focused upon. the succinct paper could not allow reporting in detail the causes of the misreadings, so they were mentioned briefly. the study concluded that the recorrection of lataif al-tafsir is totally remarkable as examining the case shows it clearly. even if one doubts about the generalizing the findings of examining this chapter to all the commentary, some other incontrovertible issues confirm the finding such as putting aside and not using the ancient original version that belongs to astan quds razavi, not having access to the complete eligible version that belongs to abu rayhan biruni library in tashkent, not using ancient commentary and etymology books, and repeated misreadings due to ignoring the register and context. keywords: lataif al-tafsir, saffat chapter, text correction, misreading, criticism, distortion introductionlataif al-tafsir is among the most ancient and comprehensive persian commentaries, published by mrs. saeedeh kamaifard with the help of miras maktoub institute. the commentary has been done based on two versions and published in five volumes. this study tried to examine the corrections of this commentary, focusing on chapter saffat of the holy quran. among the issues affecting the selection of this chapter are its size, the diversity of its contents, and the losses in the second half of the original version of this chapter. the researchers believe that this corrected commentary includes various shortcomings and mistakes and they categorized them into “form” and “content” issues.materials methods this study tried to examine the corrections of this commentary, focusing on chapter saffat of the holy quran. this chapter was selected as it is among the middle chapters of the quran, its size is big enough to be explored, it includes various issues, and ignoring the original version in the second half of this chapter. the researchers believe that the commentary has various shortcomings and categorized them into “form” and “content” shortcomings.discussion resultthe study concluded that the recorrection of lataif al-tafsir is totally remarkable as examining the case shows it clearly. even if one doubts about the generalizing the findings of examining this chapter to all the commentary, some other incontrovertible issues confirm the finding such as putting aside and not using the ancient original version that belongs to astan quds razavi.