شبکۀ روابط اجتماعی و گفت‌وگومندی زوجین: یک مطالعۀ زمینه‌ای در شهر یزد

با توجه به اینکه بستر اجتماعی که افراد در آن رشد یافته‌اند، در نحوۀ برقراری تعاملات در خانواده‌ها نقش مهمی دارد، پژوهش حاضر بر آن است تا نقش شبکۀ روابط اجتماعی را در چگونگی شکل‌گیری و وضعیت گفت‌و‌گو در خانواده‌های یزدی تبیین کند. بر این اساس، از روش‌شناسی کیفی و روش نظریۀ زمینه‎‍ای به کار گرفته و با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری نظری، از 31 نفر از زوجین خانواده‎‍های متعارف شهر یزد مصاحبۀ عمیق انجام شد؛ سپس اطلاعات گردآوری‌شده با استفاده از کدگذاری باز، محوری و گزینشی تحلیل و در قالب 63 مقولۀ فرعی و 22 مقولۀ اصلی دسته‌بندی شد. درنهایت یک مقولۀ هسته‎‍ای با عنوان «گفت‌وگو؛ برآیندی از شبکۀ روابط اجتماعی» ارائه شد؛ سپس مدل پارادایمی و طرح‌وارۀ نظری تحقیق ارائه گردید. به‌طور کلی تبیین نتایج نشان می‌دهد که گفت‌وگو برآیندی از روابط اجتماعی است که زوجین در عرصه‌های گوناگون از گذشته تا به امروز تجربه کرده‌اند. بسترهای فرهنگی و اجتماعی، ازجمله خانوادۀ مبدا با ایجاد بسترهایی دموکراتیک یا اقتدارگرایانه، بیشترین تاثیرگذاری را بر افراد دارد و پس از آن، گروه‌های دوستی، سیستم تحصیلی، شغلی و محیط زندگی افراد در شکل‌گیری تعاملات و گفت‌و‌گو در خانواده، نقش مهمی دارند و آن‌ را تحت تاثیر قرار می‌‌دهند.

social relations and interpersonal dialogue among couples: a study in the city of yazd based on the grounded theory

introduction the family as the most significant and fundamental social institution exerts direct and profound influences on other societal institutions. it assumes distinct roles and functions and addresses a range of human needs. central to family life and functioning are the relationships among family members. communication serves as the foundation through which families define themselves and members acquire the skills to navigate shared meanings (miller, 2017). consequently, communication and interactions between family members emerge as crucial characteristics within any family unit. when communication is positive and effective, it ensures the overall well-being of the family and, in turn, contributes to the health of society as a whole. effective communication skills encompass both verbal and nonverbal elements with effective verbal and conversational skills occupying a significant role in marital communication. furthermore, communication within the family, like any other form of dialogue, is influenced by cultural and social contexts. dialogue, in fact, not only stems from an individual’s background and social network, but also shapes the formation of future relationships and interactions. as per michel’s definition, a social network comprises unique connections among a specific group of individuals. these connections collectively provide insights into the social behavior exhibited by the individuals involved (mitchel, 1999). therefore, recognizing the pivotal role played by tradition, culture, and social backgrounds in fostering interactions and dialogues between couples, this research aimed to comprehend the process of dialogue formation within the context of couples’ social relations.materials and methods this research aimed to elucidate the process of dialogue formation within the context of social relations. an interpretive paradigm and qualitative methodology were employed. specifically, a grounded theory approach utilizing strauss and corbin’s objectivist perspective was adopted as the primary methodological framework. the sample selection followed a purposive and theoretical sampling technique with the goal of achieving data saturation. a total of 31 couples from normal families in yazd were chosen as participants. in-depth interviews served as the primary method of data collection. with participants’ consent, the interviews were recorded and each session lasted between 70 and 180 minutes. the data analysis utilized the theoretical coding method, which facilitated the development of the grounded theory. all recorded interviews were transcribed into text and the analysis process occurred concurrently with data collection. following strauss and corbin’s method, line-by-line analysis was conducted for open-coding, leading to the development of concepts and categories and construction of the grounded theory’s foundation. ultimately, a research paradigm model was formulated. to ensure the validity of the findings, measures, such as prolonged engagement, peer review, negative case analysis, member checking, and detailed description were employed.