بررسی استراتژیک روایت های سیاسی معاصر از امام محمد غزالی؛ درس هایی برای ایران

اندیشه اسلامی در تنگنای سنت و مدرنیته راهی جز بازخوانی انتقادی سنت فکری خود ندارد. این بازخوانی جز از طریق جدال‌های معاصر ممکن نیست و هر گونه بازخوانی گذشته به عنوان سلاحی در جدال‌های معاصر به کار می‌رود و خصم و دوست را باز تعریف می‌کند. در این مقاله چهار گفتمان استراتژیک سنتی، فراسنتی، مدرن و پسامدرن بر اساس سطح و دامنه کاربرد، رویکرد و ماهیت جدال توضیح داده می‌شود. بازخوانی‌های معاصر از اندیشه غزالی که در پنج گروه نومسیحی، نومشایی، نواشعری، نومعتزله و نوخسروانی شناسایی شده، به سنجه گفتمان‌های استراتژیک مورد ارزیابی قرار می-گیرند و در هر گروه، اندیشمندان مهم و منابع اصلی قرائت شده از غزالی معرفی می‌شوند و نکات زیربنایی بازخوانی آنها مورد بحث قرار می‌گیرد؛ هر گروه سعی دارد خلاقیت غزالی در جمع جریان‌های فکری اسلامی را به سنت خود نسبت دهد و زوال تفکر فلسفی پس از او را به تاثیرپذیری غزالی از آرای دشمن نسبت دهد. بررسی بازخوانی های معاصر از غزالی، تصویری از جریان هایی چون غرب زدگی، بنیادگرایی، و سکولاریسم در جهان معاصر اسلامی ارائه می دهد.

strategic review of contemporary political narratives by imam mohammad ghazali; recommendations for iran

in the narrowness of tradition and modernity, islamic thought has no way but to criticallyread its intellectual tradition. this re-reading is only possible through contemporaryconflicts and any re-reading of the past is used as a weapon in contemporary conflicts andredefines enemy and friend. in this article, four traditional, trans-traditional, modern andpost-modern strategic discourses are explained based on the level and scope ofapplication, approach and nature of the conflict. contemporary reinterpretations ofghazali's thought, which have been identified in five groups: neo-messihi, neo-msha'i,neo-asha'ari, neo-mutzaleh, and neo-khosravani, are evaluated according to strategicdiscourses, and in each group, important thinkers and the main sources read from ghazaliare introduced. and the underlying points of their reading are discussed; each group triesto attribute ghazali's creativity among the islamic currents of thought to their tradition,and the decline of philosophical thinking after him to ghazali's influence by the enemy'sopinions. examining contemporary readings of ghazali presents a picture of currents suchas westernization, fundamentalism, and secularism in the contemporary islamic world.imam mohammad ghazali is one of the most important thinkers of the islamic era of iran, whowas born in 450 hijri in tus. he studied in the cities of neishabur and jurjan with professorslike jovini and farmadi and became an all-time leader in various islamic sciences.as a thinker who has had significant writings in all intellectual genres of his time from thepoint of view of researchers and writers after him, ghazali's opponents are forced to react tohim and determine the task of their thought with him. after ghazali, you can't be indifferent tohim or you should follow him or oppose him! for this reason, ghazali's contemporary readingsof him are important. in fact, in contemporary re-readings of ghazali, we see their accounts ofthe reasons for the success and decline of the islamic world. these narratives are used fordifferent strategic purposes. that is, each of them uses the cause of the decline of the islamicworld, as they have already found in ghazali's thought, for a specific purpose. certain purposesmay be pursued from the heart of a narrative.what is happening to iran strategically, in terms of the problem it is facing, i.e. the decline ofrationality, has a relationship with ghazali's thought. this article is written based on the importanceof rereading ghazali's thought in the face of reason and science in islamic countries, especially iran. the article has tried to show what the strategic efforts in facing ghazali were and what is therelationship of each narrative with the characteristics of power in the contemporary era. without ananswer to ghazali's narrative and logic, it will not be possible to leave the taslib tradition in iranand the islamic world in a fundamental way. in this sense, this article has a practical and, of course,strategic approach to iran's intellectual and philosophical issues.