a reflection on kristeva's approach to the structure of 'language'

Reaching out to history and subject in terms of meaning variation, kristeva could show that language cannot simply be a saussurean sign system. rather, she went on to delineate that language, beyond signs, is associated with a dynamic system of signification where the 'speaking subject' is constantly involved in processing. julia kristeva, a french critic, psychoanalyst, theoretician, a poststructuralist philosopher of hungarian origin, dwells upon ideas from linguistics, psychoanalysis, sociology while representing text analysis, sign and subject from emotional and motivational perspectives.  she believes that processing language structure and subject depend upon semiotic and symbolic domains that emerge in the scope of 'signifiance' process whereby the semiotic domain processes and primary structures against the symbolic realm. in kristeva's view, the sign chora, while being the milieu for energy, dynamism, and motility, shows the internal and signification drives of the language, and will involve changes in signification mutation of subjectivity.