place goes wrong in treating mind-brain relationship clarifying why identity theory is neither reasonable nor a mere scientific problem in disguise

U. t. place claims that philosophical problems concerning the true nature of mindbrain relationship disappears or is settled adhering to materialism, especially type identity theory of mind. he takes above claim as a reasonable scientific hypothesis. i shall argue why it is not as he claims. at first, to pave the way for refutation, i will briefly clarify place's approach to the subject in hand; although the rest of the paper will also contain more details about his position. then, i will reduce his position into four theses and try to prove that the main claim of type identity theory is neither reasonable nor a mere scientific problem in disguise. i think that we ought to regard type identity theory, at most, just as a hypothesis which approximately displays the function of mindbrain relationship but tells us nothing justifiably about its true nature.