panentheism versus pantheism in the east and west with special reference to shankara and ramanuja’s views: an overview

Panentheism and pantheism represent one of the most profound, even startling parallels across the world’s great metaphysical traditions about which the present article seeks to explore and carry out a comparative study of certain eastern and western philosophers with special reference to the views of two chief exponents of advaita vedanta of indian philosophy, shankara and ramanuja. both these terms, touch on the relation of god and the universe with the difference that the former seems to be rigid, motionless, and abstract and lacks a kind of religious fervor in its approach, while the latter is presumed to be concrete and palpable and seeks to reconcile philosophical thinking with the demands of religious feelings as well. god in pantheism is compared to the god of spinoza, the neutrum of schelling, and shankara’s concept of indeterminate brahman. in contrast, in the west hegelian absolute, and ramanuja’s qualified brahman in indian tradition, both are accredited with panentheism in which a personal god, identity-in-and-through-difference, has all auspicious qualities. though these philosophers are from totally different temperaments and cultures, their philosophical method has certain similarities that have been examined in this work.

panentheism versus pantheism in the east and west with special reference to shankara and ramanuja’s views: an overview

panentheism and pantheism represent one of the most profound, even startling parallels across the world’s great metaphysical traditions about which the present article seeks to explore and carry out a comparative study of certain eastern and western philosophers with special reference to the views of two chief exponents of advaita vedanta of indian philosophy, shankara and ramanuja. both these terms, touch on the relation of god and the universe with the difference that the former seems to be rigid, motionless, and abstract and lacks a kind of religious fervor in its approach, while the latter is presumed to be concrete and palpable and seeks to reconcile philosophical thinking with the demands of religious feelings as well. god in pantheism is compared to the god of spinoza, the neutrum of schelling, and shankara’s concept of indeterminate brahman. in contrast, in the west hegelian absolute, and ramanuja’s qualified brahman in indian tradition, both are accredited with panentheism in which a personal god, identity-in-and-through-difference, has all auspicious qualities. though these philosophers are from totally different temperaments and cultures, their philosophical method has certain similarities that have been examined in this work.