grasping the grounds of thought: the thing-in-itself . actancy and ecology

The thing-in-itself has been contentious issue within kantian philosophy. initially, it seems like an unfortunate side-effect of kant’s distinction between phenomena and noumena. this article deals with this issue in a different manner, attempting to re-situate the thing-in-itself within kantian philosophy, albeit from an anthropological rather than a critical angle. the anthropological works of kant fully recognize that subjectivity and lived experience, as well as a thoroughgoing cognitive gradualism are necessary to “orient ourselves in thinking”. by reading the importance of the thing-in-itself from the anthropological viewpoint of otto friedrich bollnow and the kyoto school philosophy of ueda shizuteru, i argue that in all its negativity, the thing-in-itself constitutes the outer expanse of thought. connecting this exposition with contemporary thinking on actancy and ecology, and following the romantic tradition represented by schopenhauer and schelling, i argue that the thing-in-itself can be grasped indirectly and non-conceptually. as such, it constitutes the ground of thought. this insight makes kant’s initially problematic concept directly relevant for our current ecological predicament, through which we realize the necessity for epistemic humility and embracing the unknown or the noumenal dimension that we cannot conceptually represent.

grasping the grounds of thought: the thing-in-itself . actancy and ecology

the thing-in-itself has been contentious issue within kantian philosophy. initially, it seems like an unfortunate side-effect of kant’s distinction between phenomena and noumena. this article deals with this issue in a different manner, attempting to re-situate the thing-in-itself within kantian philosophy, albeit from an anthropological rather than a critical angle. the anthropological works of kant fully recognize that subjectivity and lived experience, as well as a thoroughgoing cognitive gradualism are necessary to “orient ourselves in thinking”. by reading the importance of the thing-in-itself from the anthropological viewpoint of otto friedrich bollnow and the kyoto school philosophy of ueda shizuteru, i argue that in all its negativity, the thing-in-itself constitutes the outer expanse of thought. connecting this exposition with contemporary thinking on actancy and ecology, and following the romantic tradition represented by schopenhauer and schelling, i argue that the thing-in-itself can be grasped indirectly and non-conceptually. as such, it constitutes the ground of thought. this insight makes kant’s initially problematic concept directly relevant for our current ecological predicament, through which we realize the necessity for epistemic humility and embracing the unknown or the noumenal dimension that we cannot conceptually represent.