what a world! the pluralistic universe of innocent realism

The method of metaphysics: metaphysics is empirical but depends not, like the sciences, on recondite experience but on close attention to aspects of everyday experience we ordinarily scarcely notice. real is a broader concept than exists (which applies only to particulars) and also applies to phenomena, kinds, and laws, which are real, but not, of course, existent entities. but there are real kinds, laws, etc. doesn’t imply that all the kinds and laws we believe are real, are. i call my approach innocent realism& because--though it’s certainly not naive--it requires attending to experience, so far as possible, without substantial preconceptions. there is one real world, enormously varied but also integrated. it includes physical stuff, kinds, laws, etc. and, here on earth, a vast array of human artifacts, physical, social, intellectual, and imaginative, all intimately interconnected. all this requires human mindedness (a better word than &mind& because it doesn’t suggest that human mentality is an organ like the heart or the liver). rather, it’s a complex congeries of dispositions and abilities: to understand even such a relatively simple thing as what’s involved in someone’s believing something, we need to take account of the person’s dispositions to behavior, verbal and otherwise; to the neurophysiological realizations of these dispositions; and to their connections to the world and to words in the person’s linguistic community--this last requiring other people’s words-world connection. &virtual& reality is just one more computer artifact, clever, no doubt, but not metaphysically startling. it’s oversold, but this is advertising hype, not serious metaphysics.

what a world! the pluralistic universe of innocent realism

the method of metaphysics: metaphysics is empirical but depends not, like the sciences, on recondite experience but on close attention to aspects of everyday experience we ordinarily scarcely notice. real is a broader concept than exists (which applies only to particulars) and also applies to phenomena, kinds, and laws, which are real, but not, of course, existent entities. but there are real kinds, laws, etc. doesn’t imply that all the kinds and laws we believe are real, are. i call my approach innocent realism& because--though it’s certainly not naive--it requires attending to experience, so far as possible, without substantial preconceptions. there is one real world, enormously varied but also integrated. it includes physical stuff, kinds, laws, etc. and, here on earth, a vast array of human artifacts, physical, social, intellectual, and imaginative, all intimately interconnected. all this requires human mindedness (a better word than &mind& because it doesn’t suggest that human mentality is an organ like the heart or the liver). rather, it’s a complex congeries of dispositions and abilities: to understand even such a relatively simple thing as what’s involved in someone’s believing something, we need to take account of the person’s dispositions to behavior, verbal and otherwise; to the neurophysiological realizations of these dispositions; and to their connections to the world and to words in the person’s linguistic community--this last requiring other people’s words-world connection. &virtual& reality is just one more computer artifact, clever, no doubt, but not metaphysically startling. it’s oversold, but this is advertising hype, not serious metaphysics.