on the permissible use of force in a kantian dignitarian moral and political setting, or, seven kantian samurai

On the supposition that one’s ethics and politics are fundamentally dignitarian in a broadly kantian sense—as specifically opposed to identitarian and capitalist versions of statism, e.g., neoliberal nationstates, whether democratic or nondemocratic—hence fundamentally noncoercive and nonviolent, then is selfdefense or the defense of innocent others, using force, ever rationally justifiable and morally permissible or obligatory? we think that the answer to this hard question is yes; correspondingly, in this essay we develop and defend a theory about the permissible use of force in a broadly kantian dignitarian moral and political setting, including its extension to nonviolent civil disobedience in the tradition of martin luther king, jr; and perhaps surprisingly, we also import several key insights from samurai and martial arts ethics into our theory.

On the Permissible Use of Force in a Kantian Dignitarian Moral and Political Setting, Or, Seven Kantian Samurai

On the supposition that one’s ethics and politics are fundamentally dignitarian in a broadly Kantian sense—as specifically opposed to identitarian and capitalist versions of Statism, e.g., neoliberal nationStates, whether democratic or nondemocratic—hence fundamentally noncoercive and nonviolent, then is selfdefense or the defense of innocent others, using force, ever rationally justifiable and morally permissible or obligatory? We think that the answer to this hard question is yes; correspondingly, in this essay we develop and defend a theory about the permissible use of force in a broadly Kantian dignitarian moral and political setting, including its extension to nonviolent civil disobedience in the tradition of Martin Luther King, Jr; and perhaps surprisingly, we also import several key insights from Samurai and Martial Arts ethics into our theory.