Evaluating Different Approaches To Permeability Prediction in A Carbonate Reservoir

Permeability can be directly measured using cores taken from the reservoir in the laboratory. dueto high cost associated with coring, cores are available in a limited number of wells in a field. manyempirical models, statistical methods, and intelligent techniques were suggested to predictpermeability in un-cored wells from easy-to-obtain and frequent data such as wireline logs. themain objective of this study is to assess different approaches to the prediction of the estimation ofpermeability in a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir, i.e. fahliyan formation in the southwest ofiran. the considered methods may be categorized in four groups, namely a) empirical models(timur and dual-water), b) regression analysis (simple and multiple), c) clustering methods like mrgc(multi-resolution graph-based clustering), som (self organizing map), dc (dynamic clustering) and ahc(ascending hierarchical clustering), and d) artificial intelligence techniques such as ann (artificialneural network), fuzzy logic, and neuro-fuzzy.this study shows that clustering techniques predict permeability in a heterogeneous carbonatebetter than other examined approaches. among four assessed clustering methods, som performedbetter and correctly predicted local variations. artificial intelligence techniques are average inmodeling permeability. however, empirical equations and regression methods are not capable ofpredicting permeability in the studied reservoir. the constructed and validated som model with6×9 clusters was selected to predict permeability in the blind test well of the studied field. in thiswell, the predicted permeability was in good agreement with mdt and core derived permeability.