فی المنهج النقدی عند ابن الاثیر فی کتابه (المثل السائر فی ادب الکاتب والشاعر)

یعدّ کتاب (المثل السائر فی ادب الکاتب والشاعر) من ابرز الکتب النقدیة فی العصر الایوبی، ولاسیّما انّ ضیاء الدین ابن الاثیر من اشهر الکتّاب و النقاد فی ذلک العصر، وقد جمع فی هذا الکتاب فنون البلاغة فی الادب. ولاقى هذا الکتاب قبولاً فی الوسط النقدی منذ ذلک الحین، لکنّه فی الوقت نفسه لاقى هجوماً من اطراف اخرى، وقد کان ذلک ردّ فعلٍ على ابن الاثیر الذی حاول ان یکون مبدعاً اکثر منه متّبعاً، لکنّ نشاطه النقدی بقی فی دائره التراث النقدی عموماً، وانّ سمات التفرد او تحقیق الاضافه لم تکن الّا فی نطاق الذوق الفردی الذی لا یرقى الى انتاج مفهومات نظریة حادثة. ومن ثَمَّ فانّ جهوده لم تتکشّف عن طابع منهجی منظّم، ومن هنا نجد اختلاط المستویات بین الاتّباع والابتداع، وهذا یترجم عن رویة نظریة غیر متماسکة، تفتقر الى الاتّساق الداخلی، و تبدو قاصره عن النهوض ببناء منظور متکامل و رویة منظمة.

The Critical Method of Ibn Al Ather in his book Common Proverb in the Work of the Poets and Writers

The book Common Proverb in the Work of the Poets and Writers is considered one of the most important critical books in the Al Ayyubi Period, particularly because Ibn Al Ather was the most famous writers and critics in that period. He collected in this book rhetorical works in literature. That book was well received among critics from that time on. However, some other critics opposed the views presented in the book. This was a reaction against the style of Ibn Al Ather, who wanted to be more creative than repetitive. But, his critical activity generally revolves round the critical tradition. This is the reason his distinctive features and creativity, which only appeared through the  personal opinions which he expressed did  not generated modern  theoretical   concepts. Therefore, his attempts did not express a specific and systematic approach or way of thinking. Hence, we see a mixture of creativity and imitation, which leads to incomprehensive theoretical view, inconsistency, and incapability to build a complete perspective and welldefined approach.