|
|
شناسایی و اولویتبندی عوامل سازمانی موثر بر توسعه حرفهای اعضای هیاتعلمی: رویکردی آمیخته
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
اسمعیلی ماهانی حانیه ,پورکریمی جواد ,جمالی احسان ,میرکمالی محمد
|
منبع
|
پژوهش هاي مديريت عمومي - 1400 - دوره : 14 - شماره : 52 - صفحه:33 -63
|
چکیده
|
هدف این پژوهش تعیین و اولویتبندی عوامل سازمانی موثر بر توسعه حرفهای اعضا هیئتعلمی میباشد. روش پژوهش با توجه به هدف از نوع کاربردی و ازنظر شیوه گردآوری دادهها، آمیخته اکتشافی است. در بخش کیفی برای تعیین عوامل سازمانی تاثیرگذار بر توسعه حرفهای، 34 پژوهش داخلی و خارجی با استفاده از روش فراترکیب شناسایی و مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند و بر این اساس ابزار گردآوری دادهها تهیه گردید، روایی ابزار با استفاده از روایی سازه و پایایی آن با آلفای کرونباخ مورد تایید قرار گرفت. سپس جهت تعیین اهمیت این عوامل در بخش کمی، ازنظر اعضا هیئت علمی و مدیران گروههای آموزشی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان استفاده گردید (650=n). حجم نمونه در این بخش با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 242 نفر تعیین گردید که به روش تصادفی طبقهای انتخاب شدند. بر اساس نتایج فراترکیب، 15 مولفه سازمانی موثر بر توسعه حرفهای اعضا هیئتعلمی شناسایی شد که اهمیت آنها ازنظر اعضا هیئت علمی و مدیران گروههای آموزشی نیز مورد تاکید قرار گرفت. این مولفهها بر اساس ماهیت در پنج طبقه ساختار سازمانی، تکنولوژی، جوسازمانی، منابع سازمانی و استراتژی دستهبندی شدند؛ منابع سازمانی در بالاترین رتبه و عامل تکنولوژی در جایگاه پایینتری نسبت به سایر عوامل قرار گرفتند. به نظر میرسد 15 مولفه استخراجشده در این پژوهش میتوانند نقش بسزایی جهت توسعه حرفهای اعضا هیئت علمی ایفا نمایند لذا ضروری است در برنامههای توسعه موسسات آموزش عالی مورد تاکید قرار گیرند.
|
کلیدواژه
|
توسعه حرفهای، فراترکیب، اعضا هیئتعلمی، عوامل سازمانی، آموزش عالی
|
آدرس
|
دانشگاه تهران, ایران, دانشگاه تهران, گروه مدیریت و برنامهریزی آموزشی, ایران, سازمان سنجش و آموزش کشور, ایران, دانشگاه تهران, گروه مدیریت و برنامهریزی آموزشی, ایران
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifying and Prioritizing Organizational Factors Affecting the Professional Development of Faculty Members: A Mixed Approach
|
|
|
Authors
|
Esmaili mahani Haniye ,Pourkarimi Javad ,Jamali Ehsan ,Mirkamali Seyad Mohamad
|
Abstract
|
Extended AbstractAbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine and prioritize organizational factors affecting the professional development of faculty members. The research method is exploratory in terms of purpose of data collection and in terms of data collection. In the qualitative section, 34 internal and external researches were identified and evaluated using crosssectional method to determine the organizational factors influencing professional development. Then, to determine the importance of these factors in the quantitative section, the viewpoints of faculty members and heads of departments of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman were used (N = 650). Sample size in this section was determined using Cochran formula of 242 persons. Based on crosssectional results, 15 factors influencing the professional development of faculty members were identified and their importance was emphasized by faculty members and heads of departments. These components were categorized by nature into five categories: organizational structure, technology, organization, organizational resources, and strategy; organizational resources ranked highest and technology factor ranked lower than other factors. It seems that the 15 components extracted in this study can play a significant role in the professional development of faculty member.IntroductionThe higher education system is facing many changes in different fields and increasing international competitiveness, diverse students, increasing demand of industrial societies and rapid advances in technology are major drivers of change in this environment. Therefore, higher education needs to design specific strategies to deal with such changes; Among these strategies, human resource development and change strategies are of particular importance in the higher education system in order to change and improve researchbased teaching practices that lead to higher quality universities (Olmstead Turpen, 2016: 0201361).For four reasons, the necessity and need to identify organizational factors affecting the professional development of faculty members is unbelievable. 1) Assisting faculty members in teaching, researching and delivering the three main missions of higher education 2) Students and improving the quality of education 3) Community and 4) Technological advances in teaching and learning that enhance faculty development and identify factors An organization influencing it requires more than ever before (Abbaspour et al., 2019, p. 95). This research is a step towards focusing on the factors affecting the professional development of faculty members in the higher education system. The main purpose of this research is to identify and prioritize organizational factors influencing the professional development of faculty members.Case studyThe statistical population consists of two parts. The first part contains all internal and external articles related to the professional development of faculty members between 1995 and 2018 and the second part consists of 650 faculty members of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman.Materials and Methods yThe research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of data collection heuristic. In the qualitative section, data were collected, coded, and grouped using the sevenstep procedure of Barso and Sandski 2009. For this purpose, published research on professional development of faculty members in the internal and external databases is selected as the statistical population. In this study, 34 samples were purposefully selected and categorized. The results of the seven phases of the qualitative section were designed and formulated based on a survey and with the opinion of faculty members and heads of educational departments of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman (650 people) using Cochran formula of 242 of them by sampling method. Stratified random sampling was used; data were collected. Then, using singlesample Ttest and criterion placement of the third quartile, the importance of each factor was determined and Friedman test was used to rank them.Discussion and ResultsIn this study, we tried to identify and classify the organizational factors affecting the professional development of faculty members and to evaluate the validity of these factors from the viewpoints of faculty members and heads of educational departments of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. The findings of the research indicate that in most domestic and foreign research of the last decade, fifteen components of formalism, complexity, concentration, database management systems, internet and intranet, uptodate data mining and storage tools, rewards and compensation systems, interactions Social, Organizational Commitment, Human Resources, Physical Resources, Financial Resources, GoalBased Education and Research, Commitment to Job Goals, Employee and Organization Goal Sharing have been emphasized as influential organizational factors on faculty members’ professional development. Eshraghi (2018); and Kafrila Zain (1999) in their research considered these components necessary for professional development of faculty members.Organizational Factors Influencing Faculty Members’ Professional Development in Nami et al. (2017) Research in Three Classes of Organizational Culture, Structure and Atmosphere and in Gharoneh et al. (2016) in Six Structural Classes, Job Promotion System, Organizational Culture and Atmosphere, Development Opportunity, Management and subsistence factors are categorized. The results of the evaluation of the importance of each class of organizational factors showed that all factors are important from the point of view of the sample group members and in terms of ranking the organizational resources with the highest rank and technology are ranked lower than the other factors. In the research by Grauth (2013) and Rezaian et al. (2014), organizational resources have been emphasized as a strategic factor influencing the professional development of faculty members.ConclusionBased on crosssectional results, 15 factors influencing the professional development of faculty members were identified and their importance was emphasized by faculty members and heads of departments. These components were categorized by nature into five categories: organizational structure, technology, organization, organizational resources, and strategy; organizational resources were ranked higher and technology factor lower than other factors.
|
Keywords
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|