|
|
ارزیابی عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد ذرت دانهای (.zea mays l) هیبرید ماکسیما تحت تاثیر رژیم های آبیاری و خاکورزی
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
نصیرپور صادق ,جهانسوز محمدرضا ,احمدی علی ,افشون اسماعیل
|
منبع
|
تنش هاي محيطي در علوم زراعي - 1402 - دوره : 16 - شماره : 2 - صفحه:369 -381
|
چکیده
|
بهمنظور مطالعه تاثیر شیوههای گوناگون خاکورزی و رژیم های آبیاری بر عملکرد ذرت دانه ای (.zea mays l) هیبرید ماکسیما، آزمایشی بهصورت کرتهای یکبار خردشده در قالب طرح بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مزرعه پژوهشی دانشگاه تهران واقع در کرج در سال 1395 اجرا شد. عامل اصلی در این آزمایش خاکورزی با دو سامانه خاکورزی (مرسوم و بدون خاکورزی) و عامل فرعی سه رژیم آبیاری (بدون تنش آبی، تنش آبی متوسط و تنش آبی شدید به ترتیب بر اساس 75، 110 و 150 میلی متر تبخیر از سطح تشتک تبخیر کلاس a) در نظر گرفته شد. نتایج نشان داد اثر اصلی خاکورزی و برهمکنش خاکورزی و رژیم های آبیاری بر هیچکدام از صفات معنی دار نشد، ولی اثر اصلی رژیم های آبیاری بر تمامی صفات معنیدار شد. بیشترین ارتفاع بوته، تعداد دانه در ردیف، وزن هزار دانه، وزن بلال، عملکرد دانه، عملکرد زیستی و شاخص برداشت از تیمار بدون تنش آبی و بیشترین کارایی مصرف آب از تیمار تنش آبی شدید حاصل شد. همچنین نتایج نشان داد تنش آبی شدید و متوسط نسبت به شرایط بدون تنش آبی به ترتیب موجب کاهش 40.2 و 16.85 درصدی از عملکرد دانه شد. ازآنجاکه شیوه خاکورزی بر هیچکدام از صفات موردمطالعه تاثیر معنی داری نداشت، شیوه بدون خاکورزی بهمنظور بهبود خصوصیات خاک همراه با آبیاری ذرت بر اساس 75 میلی متر تبخیر از سطح تشتک تبخیر در شرایط اقلیمی مشابه پیشنهاد می گردد..
|
کلیدواژه
|
ارتفاع بوته، شاخص برداشت، عملکرد زیستی، کارایی مصرف آب، وزن هزار دانه
|
آدرس
|
دانشگاه تهران، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی, گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات, ایران, دانشگاه تهران، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی, گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات, ایران, دانشگاه تهران، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی, گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات, ایران, دانشگاه تهران، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی, گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات, ایران
|
پست الکترونیکی
|
esmaeilafshoon@ut.ac.ir
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluation of yield and yield components of maize (zea mays l.) under the influence of irrigation regimes and tillage systems
|
|
|
Authors
|
nasirpour s. ,jahansouz m.r ,ahmadi a. ,afshoon e.
|
Abstract
|
introductionmaize (zea mays l.) is ranked fourth among cereals in terms of area under cultivation and grain yield after wheat, barley and rice. water scarcity or water stress is one of the most limiting factors in crop growth and crop yield, which reduces the average yield by 50% and even higher values. water stress in corn through adverse effects on inoculation and grain filling, reduced plant photosynthesis, reduced amount of material grown and as a result of grain shrinkage, reduced leaf area and disrupting physiological processes, reduces the number of grains per ear, weight thousands of seeds, bio-yield and grain yield. conservation tillage is one of the inevitable methods of conservation agriculture by which the effect of water stress on plant growth and yield can be reduced. in agro-ecosystems, conservation tillage, while preserving and improving water resources and the environment, improves crop production and makes it sustainable. since iran is located in the arid and semi-arid region of the world and drought has a negative impact on the yield of its products, the study of water stress and strategies to deal with it is of particular importance; therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the yield response and yield components of maize to tillage systems and irrigation regimes in karaj. materials and methodsin order to evaluate the effect of different tillage systems and irrigation regimes on corn yield, an experiment was conducted as split-plot in the form of randomized complete blocks with three replications in the research farm of the university of tehran (longitude 35 degrees east, latitude 35 degrees and 48 minute north) in 2016. the main factor in this experiment was tillage with two levels (no-tillage and conventional tillage) and the second factor was irrigation with three levels (without water stress, moderate water stress and severe water stress based on 75, 110 and 150 mm evaporation from evaporation pan surface, respectively). irrigation was done using plastic tapes (type) and the irrigation volume was controlled by the meter. irrigation treatments were applied from the 4-leaf stage. the distance between the main, sub-factors and blocks (replicates) was 10, 2 and 10 meters, respectively, and there were six 10-meter planting lines within each experimental plot. also, the distance between rows of corn in the plots was 75 cm and the distance between plants per row was 15.5 cm (density of 86,000 plants per hectare). to determine the water requirement, the class a evaporation pan method was used and using daily meteorological data, equations 1 and 2 were used:etc = kc × et0 (eq. 1)et0 = k p × e pan (eq. 2)in them, etc = evapotranspiration of the desired crop (mm.day-1), kc= plant coefficient, et0= reference evapotranspiration (mm.day-1), kp= plate coefficient (without unit), e pan= evaporation of the pan (mm.day-1)resultsthe results showed that the effect of tillage and tillage interaction at irrigation levels on any of the traits was not significant, but the effect of irrigation regimes on plant height, number of seeds per ear, 1000-seed weight, ear weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index and water use efficiency were significant. the highest plant height was obtained in conditions without water stress (217 cm). also, the highest number of seeds per ear was obtained under normal irrigation conditions, so that the application of severe stress reduced the number of seeds per ear by 26%. severe water stress reduced the weight of 1000 seeds by 12%. also, the weight of ear decreased by 38% compared to normal irrigation in severe stress and reached 151 g. the highest grain yield in normal irrigation was 12471 kg.ha-1, which severe stress reduced grain yield by almost 40%. a similar trend was observed in biological yield, with severe water stress reducing by 29%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|