ارزیابی و اعتبار سنجی اخلاقی از مسئولیت های قانونی دفتر بودجه کنگره در تعیین بودجه سالیانه در ایالات متحده

این مطالعه به بررسی ارزیابی و اعتبار سنجی اخلاقی از مسئولیت های قانونی دفتر بودجه کنگره در تعیین بودجه سالیانه در ایالات متحده می پردازد. روش مورد استفاده در این پژوهش به صورت توصیفی تحلیلی می باشد و برای جمع آوری اطلاعات از رویکرد اسنادی استفاده شده است. اگرچه در بسیاری موارد بودجه سالانه علاوه بر تحمیل نظرات کارشناسان دفتر ریاست جمهوری و همچنین مجلس سنا دچار تغییراتی می شود اما مهم ترین بخش تصویب آن در کنگره صورت می گیرد و در این میان دفتر بودجه نقش کلیدی برای تایید و تصویب آن دارد. این موضوع بدان معنی است که بدون در نظر گرفتن نقش کلیدی این نهاد نمی توان فرایند بودجه ریزی در ایالات متحده را مورد بررسی قرار داد، چرا که وظیفه اصلی تعیین و تخمین بودجه سالانه و نظارت بر اجرای صحیح خرج کرد آن در ایالات متحده طبق قانون مصوب 1974 میلادی بر عهده دفتر بودجه است. تصویب بودجه از نظر قانونی و اخلاقی در ایالات متحده آمریکا متضمن بررسی دقیق بودجه، عملکرد و تفریق آن می باشد به نحوی که دفتر بودجه خود را از نظر قانونی و اخلاقی موظف می داند تا تمامی مراحل آن را دقیق به انجام برساند.

ethical evaluation and validation of the congressional budget office's legal responsibilities in defining annual budgeting in the united states

the process of us government approval is affected by the conditions, and many specialized departments in congress, the presidential palace, and the senate are examining it. this study examines the legal and ethical responsibilities of the congressional budget office in determining annual budgets in the united states. the method used in this study is descriptive analytical and documentary approach was used for data collection. an important issue to consider with regard to the annual budget of the united states is that the congressional budget office has tight control over the amount and manner of annual budget allocation so that one of the most important causes of congressional oversight of the us budget can be the ability of the congressional office to review. he knew the exact conditions. although in many cases the annual budget changes in addition to imposing the opinions of experts on the office of the president and the senate as well, the most important part of its approval is in congress and the budget office plays a key role in its approval and approval. this means that regardless of the key role of the entity, the us budgeting process cannot be examined, since the primary task of determining and estimating annual budget and overseeing its proper implementation is spent in the united states. under the 1974 act, it is in charge of the budget office. legally and ethically approved budgeting in the united states involves careful scrutiny of the budget, its performance, and its subtraction so that its budget office is legally and morally obliged to do all of its steps accurately. it should be noted, however, that its oversight role is less than that of qualified bodies in the senate, which some scholars regard as the most important functional task of the budget office to properly and appropriately allocate funds. the appropriation is made by the congressional bureau to facilitate the approval process, so that it can be dealt with more quickly and with greater transparency in the final form of a joint meeting of the senate and congress. this illustrates the strategic role of the budget office in the process of approval, communication and oversight of the us budget.