|
|
واسنجی دو مدل برآورد تابش خورشیدی و توسعه دو مدل تابش تک پارامتری بر اساس ابرناکی در مشهد، ایران
|
|
|
|
|
نویسنده
|
میان آبادی آمنه ,اقتداری مهرنوش ,فریدحسینی علیرضا
|
منبع
|
پژوهش هاي اقليم شناسي - 1391 - دوره : 3 - شماره : 11 - صفحه:53 -64
|
چکیده
|
میزان تابش خورشیدی رسیده به سطح زمین یکی از کاربردی ترین پارامترهایی است که در پروژه ها و مدل سازی های هیدرولوژی، کشاورزی، هواشناسی و اقلیمی از اهمیت بالایی برخوردار است. با توجه به اهمیت این پارامتر، معادلات بسیاری جهت برآورد آن توسط محققان در سراسر جهان پیشنهاد شده است. در این مطالعه، دو مدل مهم تابش خورشیدی شامل مدل آنگستروم پرسکات و گارج گارج در منطقه مشهد با توجه به داده های موجود و به روش حداقل مربعات خطا واسنجی شده و ضرایب مدل ها به دست آمد. همچنین دو مدل جدید تک پارامتری بر پایه ابرناکی توسعه یافته که هر دو از دقت قابل قبولی برخوردار می باشند. ضرایب مدل آنگستروم – پرسکات در این مطالعه به ترتیب به صورت a=0.25 و b=0.42 به دست آمد. همچنین ضرایب مدل گارج گارج نیز به ترتیب x=0.27، y=0.42 و z=0.0028 تعیین شد. پارامترهای آماری ضریب تبیین، rmse، mbeو t نشان دهنده قابل قبول بودن این ضرایب می باشد. طبق نتایج حاصل شده این پارامترها برای معادله آنگستروم پرسکات در مرحله واسنجی به ترتیب برابر 0/8749، 2/4648، 0/1368- و 2/361 و برای معادله گارج گارج برابر 0/8748، 2/4553، 0/1073- و 1/8589 ومی باشد. همچنین پارامترهای آماری نشان می دهد که معادلات توسعه یافته در این مطالعه نیز از دقت قابل قبولی حتی نسبت به معادله آنگستروم پرسکات برخوردار می باشند. این پارامترها نیز برای مدل شماره 1 به ترتیب برابر 0/9636، 1/4927، 0/2504 و 5/4893 و برای مدل شماره 2 برابر 0/9153، 2/3767، 0/66و 9/3504 به دست آمد. بنابراین با توجه به این که جهت محاسبه این معادلات تنها پارامتر ابرناکی مورد نیاز است، کاربرد آنها و به خصوص مدل شماره 1 در محاسبه تابش توصیه میشود.
|
کلیدواژه
|
تابش خورشیدی، مدل آنگستروم- پرسکات، مدل گارج- گارج، مدل توسعه یافته، ابرناکی
|
آدرس
|
دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد, ایران, دانشگاه تهران, ایران, دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد, گروه مهندسی آب, ایران
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration of two Solar Radiation Models and Development of two One-Parametric Solar Radiation Models Based on the Cloudiness in Mashhad, Iran
|
|
|
Authors
|
Mianabadi A ,Eghtedari M ,FaridHosseini A
|
Abstract
|
IntroductionSurface solar radiation is an important parameter in hydrological, meteorological, climatological and crop yield models. Some parameters such as precipitation and temperature are widely available. By contrast, direct measurements of surface solar radiation are very sparse in most regions, especially in highland and mountainous regions. Lack of adequate observations on solar radiation has ever been a persistent problem in studies of landsurface processes. Hence, alternative techniques are required to estimate solar radiation. Apart from astronomical and geographical factors, incoming solar radiation is strongly modified by cloud cover, the underlying surface albedo, atmospheric turbidity, absorption and scattering. Empirical models which express global solar radiation as a function of these variables have been proposed by various investigators. Since most proposed empirical models are not flexible but rather restrictive in their application, their suitability for a particular location would largely depend on validation against actual measurements. Materials and MethodsMashhad is located at latitude 36º 17ʹ 45ʺN, longitude59º 36ʹ 43ʺE and at 992 meters altitude. Because of its situation, the city experiences different air masses and has a specific changing climate. Considering the Average temperature and precipitation (14.1 °C and 255.2 mm, respectively), the city has a semiarid climate based on Demartonne Method. The average sunshine hours and solar radiation intensity in the city are about 2892 hours/ year and 195 W/m2, respectively.In this study, we used temperature data, sunshine hours, relative humidity and precipitation to estimate the solar radiation (Rs). To compare the estimated and measured data, we used the measured solar radiation by Pyranometer that is available for 10 years (19942003). Extraterrestrial radiation (Ra) was calculated by the equation obtained by Allen and his colleagues (Allen et al., 1998). In this study we investigated two solar radiation models Angstrom–Prescott and Garg and Garg models and determined their coefficients for Mashhad. For this purpose, the least squares error method was applied. To calculate coefficients of both equations, we used the MATLAB programming language. We used the data sets of 19942000 for calibration and 20012003 for validation.Some of the radiation models are based on the cloudiness. Therefore in this study we developed 2 new radiation models based on cloudiness data. These two models are generally presented as equation 11 and 12: In these equations N is fraction of cloudiness (octal) and A, B, C, K and M are constant coefficients. Results and Discussion Based on available data from 19942000, coefficients of Angstrom–Prescott Model were determined as a=0.25 and b=0.42. High determination coefficient (R2of 0.87 and 0.89 for calibration and validation respectively, and low RMSE (2.46 and 5.15) and MBE (0.14 and 4.63) confirm that the coefficients are acceptable.Also coefficients of Garg and Garg model were determined as X=0.27, Y=0.42 and Z=0.0028.The amounts of R2 (0.87 and 0.89 for calibration and validation stages), RMSE (2.45 and 5.08) and MBE (0.11 and 4.56) show that the coefficients of Garg and Garg model are acceptable too.As mentioned before, Cloudiness is one of the most important parameters for determination of solar radiation and many equations were developed based on this parameter. Therefore, in this study, two models were developed based on cloudiness. The first equation obtained using 19942000 data sets are as follow: The second equation is: For these equations, determination coefficient is equal to 0.84 and 0.82, respectively. ConclusionAlthough water vapor is effective on solar radiation and AngstrumPrescott model is better than Garg and Garg model, but there isn't much difference between these two models. So, because of requiring less meteorological data than Garg and Garg model, AngstrumPrescott model is suggested .Of the two developed models in this study, equation 1 has more accuracy and validity than equation 2. Meanwhile, developed models have higher accuracy compared to AngstromPrescott and Garg Garg models. Also, we should consider the fact that, AngstromPrescott model for calculating the radiation requires two parameters, which from these two parameters the N value can be obtained. Additionally, this value may not be accurate for the study area. Overall, using developed Model 1 cab is recommended for this research when only cloudiness parameter is known.
|
Keywords
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|