the socio-political aspect of religious terminologies in medieval iran: the case of “akhbārīuṣūlī” in kitāb alnaqḍ written by ʿabd aljalīl qazwīnī rāzī (d. 560/1165)

The conflict between the akhbārīs and uṣūlīs dates from the time of mawlá muḥammad amīn astarābādī (d. 1033/1624). however, limited usage of the two terms can be traced back to before that period. kitāb alnaqḍ, written by ʿabd aljalīl qazwīnī rāzī (d. 560/1165), is one of the few imāmī sources that contains a group of references to a similar conflict between the shiʿa uṣūlīyyah and shiʿa akhbārīyyah. the former term, in particular, repeatedly appears in the book. the aim of this paper, adopting a conceptual approach to history, would be to demonstrate that the akhbārī/uṣūlī terms in medieval iran do not refer to a legal concept, nor to the dispute between the moderate/extremist shiʿis in that context. despite the first impression which the term conveys, it will be suggested that the term “uṣūlīyyah” does not have its roots in uṣūl alfiqh (islamic legal methodology), but rather, refers to some specific rational uṣūl (principles) usually applied to uṣūl alʿaqāʾid (islamic theological principles). that is, “uṣūlīyyah,” according to qazwīnī, refers to those whose religious knowledge has been based on rational principles. however, the akhbārīuṣūlī terminology introduced by qazwīnī cannot be paired with the historical shiʿi schools and figures of his period. if we consider the social and political pressures under which iranian imāmīs were living, it will appear that employment of such terms has had a strategic purpose. in this case, calling most of his contemporaries “uṣūlīs,” and attributing controversial shiʿi beliefs to the akhbārīs, qazwīnī has attempted to exonerate imāmīs from their accusations, and to improve their social position.

The SocioPolitical Aspect of Religious Terminologies in Medieval Iran: The Case of “Akhbārīuṣūlī” in Kitāb alNaqḍ Written by ʿAbd alJalīl Qazwīnī Rāzī (d. 560/1165)

The conflict between the Akhbārīs and Uṣūlīs dates from the time of Mawlá Muḥammad Amīn Astarābādī (d. 1033/1624). However, limited usage of the two terms can be traced back to before that period. Kitāb alNaqḍ, written by ʿAbd alJalīl Qazwīnī Rāzī (d. 560/1165), is one of the few Imāmī sources that contains a group of references to a similar conflict between the Shiʿa Uṣūlīyyah and Shiʿa Akhbārīyyah. The former term, in particular, repeatedly appears in the book. The aim of this paper, adopting a conceptual approach to history, would be to demonstrate that the Akhbārī/Uṣūlī terms in medieval Iran do not refer to a legal concept, nor to the dispute between the moderate/extremist Shiʿis in that context. Despite the first impression which the term conveys, it will be suggested that the term “uṣūlīyyah” does not have its roots in uṣūl alfiqh (Islamic legal methodology), but rather, refers to some specific rational uṣūl (principles) usually applied to uṣūl alʿaqāʾid (Islamic theological principles). That is, “uṣūlīyyah,” according to Qazwīnī, refers to those whose religious knowledge has been based on rational principles. However, the AkhbārīUṣūlī terminology introduced by Qazwīnī cannot be paired with the historical Shiʿi schools and figures of his period. If we consider the social and political pressures under which Iranian Imāmīs were living, it will appear that employment of such terms has had a strategic purpose. In this case, calling most of his contemporaries “uṣūlīs,” and attributing controversial Shiʿi beliefs to the Akhbārīs, Qazwīnī has attempted to exonerate Imāmīs from their accusations, and to improve their social position.