beyond tradition: proposing a new framework for speech act classifications

Speech act theory is a significant issue in comprehending the intricate dynamics of human communication, acting as a guiding light in understanding how language is used to perform actions beyond the literal meanings of words. while traditional frameworks have presented valuable perceptions in classifying speech acts, the evolving nature of communication requires reconsidering and expanding these conventional approaches. the researchers of the current study proposed an innovative framework for speech act classifications, one that exceeds traditional boundaries and embraces the nuanced complexities of modern discourse. based on seminal works by austin (1962) and searle (1969), and also by considering important research by grice (1975), levinson (1983), and emerging perspectives represented by verschueren (1999) and sbisa (2002), the researchers of this study critically assess current classifications, identifying essential challenges and opportunities in speech act analysis. the proposed framework introduces other categories such as metaplocutionary acts, interlocutionary acts, and negotiation acts, offering a more comprehensive and context-sensitive approach to understanding speech acts. through interdisciplinary collaboration and empirical validation, the researchers of this study aim to refine and apply this framework across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts, thereby paving the way for a more nuanced and dynamic comprehension of human communication.