An Analysis of Hospital Accreditation Policy in Iran

Background: public policymaking is complex and lacks research evidences, particularly in the eastern mediterranean region (emr). this policy analysis aims to generate insights about the process of hospital accreditation policy making in iran, to identify factors influencing policymaking and to evaluate utilization of evidence in policy making process. methods: the study examined the policymaking process using walt and gilson framework. a qualitative research design was employed. thirty key informant interviews with policymakers and stakeholders were conducted. in addi-tion hundred and five related documents were reviewed. data was analyzed using framework analysis. results: the accreditation program was a decision made at ministry of health and medical education in iran. many healthcare stakeholders were involved and evidence from leading countries was used to guide policy development. poor hospital managers‟ commitment, lack of physicians‟ involvement and inadequate resources were the main bar-riers in policy implementation. furthermore, there were too many accreditations standards and criteria, surveyors were not well-trained, had little motivation for their work and there was low consistency among them. conclusion: this study highlighted the complex nature of policymaking cycle and highlighted various factors influen-cing policy development, implementation and evaluation. an effective accreditation program requires a robust well- governed accreditation body, various stakeholders‟ involvement, sufficient resources and sustainable funds, enough human resources, hospital managers‟ commitment, and technical assistance to hospitals.