external validation of finnish diabetes risk score and australian diabetes risk assessment tool prediction models to identify people with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in iran

Background: noninvasive risk prediction models have been widely used in various settings to identify individuals with undiagnosed diabetes. objectives: we aimed to evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness of the finnish diabetes risk score (findrisc) and australian diabetes risk assessment (ausdrisk) to screen undiagnosed diabetes in kerman, iran. methods: we analyzed data from 2014 to 2018 in the second round of the kerman coronary artery disease risk factors study (kercadrs), iran. participants aged 35 - 65 with no history of confirmed diabetes were eligible. the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (auroc) and decision curve analysis were applied to evaluate the discrimination power and clinical usefulness of the models, respectively. the calibration was assessed by the hosmer-lemeshow test and the calibration plots. results: out of 3262 participants, 145 (4.44%) had undiagnosed diabetes. the estimated aurocs were 0.67 and 0.62 for the ausdrisk and findrisc models, respectively (p < 0.001). the chi-square test results for findrisc and ausdrisc were 7.90 and 16.47 for the original model and 3.69 and 14.61 for the recalibrated model, respectively. based on the decision curves, useful threshold ranges for the original models of findris and ausdrisk were 4% to 10% and 3% to 13%, respectively. useful thresholds for the recalibrated models of findrisc and ausdrisk were 4% to 8% and 4% to 9%, respectively. conclusions: the original ausdrisk model performs better than findrisc in identifying patients with undiagnosed diabetes and could be used as a simple and noninvasive tool where access to laboratory facilities is costly or limited.