استراتژی‌های کودک‌همسران در مواجهه با مسائل زندگی زناشویی (مقایسه دو گروه از کودک‌همسران)

هدف: پژوهش پیش‌رو در پی مطالعۀ استراتژی‌های کودک‌همسران در مواجهه با مسائل برخاسته از ازدواج‌شان در دوران کودکی بوده است. روش: جهت رسیدن به اهداف تحقیق از روش کیفی استفاده شده است. جمع‌آوری داده‌ها با کاربست مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته با دو گروه صورت پذیرفت. گروه نخست شامل کودک همسرانی است که هنوز در سنین کودکی (زیر 18 سال) به سر می برند و گروه دوم کودک همسرانی هستند که دوران کودکی خود را طی نموده و در محدودۀ سنی 18 تا 35 سال قرار دارند. ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ: ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﻣﺘﻮن ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از روش ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﺗﻤﺎﺗﯿﮏ، ﻧﺸﺎن داد ﮐﻪ ﻣﺸﺎرﮐﺖﮐﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎن ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮرتﻫﺎی ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﭘﺪﯾﺪه آﻣﺪه در زﻧﺪﮔﯽ زﻧﺎﺷﻮﯾﯽ ﺧﻮد واﮐﻨﺶ ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽدﻫﻨﺪ و اﺳﺘﺮاﺗﮋی ﻫﺎی ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ و ﻣﺘﻔﺎوﺗﯽ را ﺑﺮﻣﯽﮔﺰﯾﻨﻨﺪ. اﯾﻦ اﺳﺘﺮاﺗﮋیﻫﺎ در ﻗﺎﻟﺐ دو ﻣﻘﻮﻟﮥ اﺻﻠﯽ 1. اﺳﺘﺮاﺗﮋیﻫﺎی ﻣﻨﻔﻌﻼﻧﻪ و 2. اﺳﺘﺮاﺗﮋیﻫﺎی ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﻣﻄﺮح ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. ﺑﺮاﺳﺎس ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎی ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺑﺎﯾﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ اﺳﺘﺮاﺗﮋیﻫﺎی ﻣﻨﻔﻌﻼﻧﻪ در ﻣﯿﺎن ﻫﺮ دو ﮔﺮوه ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ؛ از ﻃﺮﻓﯽ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ اﺳﺘﺮاﺗﮋیﻫﺎ در ﺳﻄﺢ ﻓﺮدی ﻟﺤﺎظ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.

Child-Spouse Strategies in Dealing with Life Issues Marital (Comparison of Two Groups of Children-Spouses)

Leading research has sought to study the strategies of children and spouses in dealing with issues arising from their childhood marriage. Qualitative method has been used to achieve the research objectives. Data were collected using semistructured interviews with two groups. The first group includes children of spouses who are still in childhood (under 18 years old) and the second group of children are spouses who have completed their childhood and are in the age range of 18 to 35 years. In this study, which was conducted in autumn and winter of 1398, participants were selected from four cities of Bajestan, Bardaskan, Torbat Heydariyeh and Gonabad using purposive or theoretical sampling method. Analysis of interview texts using thematic analysis method showed that research participants react to the issues in their married life in different ways and choose different strategies. These strategies were presented in the form of two main categories: 1. Passive strategies and 2. Active strategies, which showed the prevalence of passive strategies among both groups. On the other hand, most of the strategies were considered at the individual level.