نقد و بررسیِ کتاب: «تاریخ بدن در ادبیات» نوشته‌ی سید مهدی زرقانی

ﮐﺘﺎب ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ ﺑﺪن در ادﺑﯿﺎت، ﻧﻮﺷﺘﮥ ﺳﯿﺪ ﻣﻬﺪی زرﻗﺎﻧﯽ و ﻫﻤﮑﺎران (1398)، ﺑﻪ ﺳﯿﺮِ ﺷﮑﻞﮔﯿﺮی ﺑﺪن ﻫﺎی ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ و ﻃﺒﻘﮥ ﺑﻨﺪی آن ﻫﺎ در ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ ادﺑﯿﺎت ﻓﺎرﺳﯽ ﻣﯽ ﭘﺮدازد و ﺗﻠﻘﯽ ﻫﺎی ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ درﺑﺎره‌ ﺑﺪن را در آﺛﺎر ﺷﺎﻋﺮان، ﻋﺎرﻓﺎن و ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪان ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻣﯽ ﮐﻨﺪ. از ﺣﯿﺚ ﻣﻮﺿﻮع، ﮐﺘﺎب ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺴﯿﺎر ﺑﺪﯾﻊ و ﻧﻮ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎر ﻣﯽآﯾﺪ، اﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﯿﻦ ﻧﻮ ﺑﻮدن و ﻋﺪمِ ﭘﯿﺸﯿﻨﮥ ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ، ﻧﺎﮔﺰﯾﺮ دﭼﺎر ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﻟﻐﺰش ﻫﺎ و ﻧﻘﺼﺎن ﻫﺎیِ «ﻣﺤﺘﻮاﯾﯽ» و «ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎری» ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. از آن ﺟﺎ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻤﮑﻦ اﺳﺖ اﯾﻦ اﺛﺮ ﻣﻮرد اﺳﺘﻨﺎد و اﺳﺘﻔﺎده دﯾﮕﺮ ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﮕﺮان ﻗﺮار ﮔﯿﺮد، ذﮐﺮِ ﭘﺎری از ﻟﻐﺰش ﻫﺎی ﮐﺘﺎب ﺿﺮوری ﻣﯽ ﻧﻤﺎﯾﺪ. ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮاﯾﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﮥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ اﺑﺘﻨﺎء ﺑﺮﺗﻌﺎﻃﯽ اﻓﮑﺎر و ﺑﻪ دور از داوری ﻫﺎی ﻏﺮضورزاﻧﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪه ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺄﻣﻞ، درﻧﮓ و ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮ، ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻮﺟﻮدِ در ﮐﺘﺎب ﻣﻮرد «ﺑﺎزﻧﮕﺮی» و «اﺻﻼح» ﻗﺮار ﮔﯿﺮﻧﺪ. از ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻟﻐﺰش ﻫﺎی ﮐﺘﺎب ﻣﯽ ﺗﻮان ﺑﻪ : ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎی روشﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ، ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾﮔﻮﯾﯽ، ﺗﻘﻠﯿﻞﮔﺮاﯾﯽ، ﭼﺎرﭼﻮبِ ﻧﻈﺮی ﺿﻌﯿﻒ، ﻧﻈﺮﮔﺎه ﺗﮏﺑﻌﺪی (اﯾﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﯾﮏ)، ﻓﻘﺪانِ ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻬﻢ، ﻋﺪم اﻧﺴﺠﺎم و ﭼﻨﺪﭘﺎرﮔﯽ در اﻫﺪاف ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ و ...، اﺷﺎره ﮐﺮد. ﻣﻘﺎﻟﮥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ روشِ ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻠﯽ- ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻔﯽ و ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪف ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ و ﺗﻨﻘﯿﺢ ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﻟﻐﺰش ﻫﺎی ﻣﻮﺟﻮد در ﮐﺘﺎب و ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﻧﻘﺪآن ﻫﺎ، ﻧﮕﺎﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ و ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎی ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﺸﺎن از وﺟﻮد ﻧﻘﺼﺎُ ن ﻫﺎی روشﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﯽ و ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎری در ﮐﺘﺎب دارﻧﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻧﯿﺎزﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﺎزﻧﮕﺮی و اﺻﻼح از ﺳﻮی ﻧﻮﯾﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎنِ ﮐﺘﺎب اﺳﺖ.

Book Review: The History of the Body in Literature by Seyyed Mehdi Zarqani

The Book of Body History in Literature, by Seyyed Mehdi Zarghani et al. (1398), deals with the development of different bodies and their classification in the history of Persian literature and their different views. Examines the body in the works of poets, mystics, and artists. From the point of view of the present, the present book is very novel and novel, but given its newness and lack of detailed research background, it inevitably suffers from some &content& and &structural& slips and defects. That’s right. Since this work may be cited and used by other scholars, mentioning the book’s slips is necessary. The present article, therefore, is based on a thought-provoking, far-fetched judgment, in order to &revise& and &refine& some of the issues in the book by reflection, reflection, and discussion. Book slides can include: Methodological errors, Contradition, Reduction, Weak theoretical framework, One-dimensional (ideological) view, Lack of some important resources, He noted the lack of coherence and fragmentation in the aims of the research and so on. In the present article, we will explain and critique some of these points and their critiques.