Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Image: A Survey

With the increasing demand for image-based applications, the efficient and reliable evaluation of image quality has increased in importance. measuring the image quality is of fundamental importance for numerous image processing applications, where the goal of image quality assessment (iqa) methods is to automatically evaluate the quality of images in agreement with human quality judgments. numerous iqa methods have been proposed over the past years to fulfill this goal. in this paper, a survey of the quality assessment methods for conventional image signals, as well as the newly emerged ones, which includes the high dynamic range (hdr) images, is presented. a thorough explanation of the subjective and objective iqa, and their classification is provided. six widely used subjective quality datasets, and performance measures are overviewed. emphasis is given to the full-reference image quality assessment (fr-iqa) methods, and 9 often-used quality measures (including mean squared error (mse), structural similarity index (ssim), multi-scale structural similarity index (ms-ssim), visual information fidelity (vif), most apparent distortion (mad), feature similarity measure (fsim), feature similarity measure for color images (fsimc), dynamic range independent measure (drim), and tone-mapped images quality index (tmqi)) are thoroughly described. moreover, the performance and computation time of these metrics on four subjective quality datasets are evaluated.