بررسی سیاست مبارزه با تروریسم آمریکا در غرب آسیا و تقابل آن با امنیت ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران

پژوهش حاضر با طرح این سوال که سیاست مبارزه با تروریسم امریکا از چه راه هایی بر امنیت ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران اثرگذار است؟ نسبت به استراتژی کلان امریکا پس از دوران بوش در قبال تروریسم پرداخته که بر امنیت ایران اثرگذار بوده است. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که با مطرح شدن استراتژی توازن فراساحلی، رویکرد دولت های امریکا پس از به قدرت رسیدن اوباما با هدف اجتناب از جنگ و نظامی گری و در عین حال مدیریت امور سیاسی و اقتصادی مناطق حساس از جمله خاورمیانه بوده است. همچنین سیاست مبارزه با تروریسم امریکا در چارچوب استراتژی موازنه فراساحلی یا مدیریت از راه دور، با فعال کردن نقش متحدان منطقه ای، واگذاری امور به ائتلاف ها و اتحادهای همسو با منافع خود در منطقه غرب آسیا، امنیت ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران را با چالش روبرو کرده است. امریکا به طور غیرمستقیم از بازیگران غیردولتی همسو با ایران نظیر حماس، حزب الله و سایر گروه های جهادی در منطقه تحت عنوان تروریسم یاد می کند و در عین حال حامی کشورهایی در منطقه خاورمیانه است که بر علیه گروه های همسو با ایران می جنگند و یا گروه های تکفیری را مورد حمایت قرار می دهند. رویه اخیر امریکا در تضاد با امنیت ملی ج. ا. ایران است که با محور مقاومت در خارج از مرزها پیوند خورده است. در مقاله حاضر از روش توصیفی-تحلیلی و ابزار کتابخانه ای استفاده شده است.

examination of u.s. counter-terrorism policy in west asia and its confrontation with the national security of the islamic republic of iran

after the events of september 11, the fight against terrorism waspursued with particular seriousness by the us government, which was manifested in a military form, specifically by the invasion of afghanistan and then by the invasion of iraq. as time passed and theimposition of extensive military costs on the us, the country, byaligning its interests with regional allies, identified a range of militantgroups in the middle east and west asia that were aligned with theislamic republic of iran as terrorists and adopted mechanisms tocounter their influence. the groups that were mostly gathered aroundthe discourse of the islamic revolution of iran outside the borders andincluded the syrian government, hamas militias and the politicalmilitarygroup hezbollah, and then resistance groups in iraq and then yemen were added to them. with the coming to power of obama, theunited states of america has adopted a new strategy to repel threatsagainst itself in various regions, which, although not accompanied bydirect participation, military presence and open intervention, has asignificant impact on the course of affairs. using the capacity ofregional actors aligned with its interests and its allies in west asia,including israel, turkey, and some members of the gulf cooperationcouncil, in the form of coalitions, having military bases, andinvolving them in the counterterrorism program and remotemanagement, has created a new approach to maintaining its influencein west asia. this approach has created confrontations, given thepresence of the islamic republic of iran as an effective actor in theregion and having multiple interests and state and non-state actorsfighting for their independence and popular and ideological power.some of these confrontations are threats to iran's national security,which is defined beyond borders and has placed the fight againsttyranny and support for oppressed and muslim nations in its foreignpolicy agenda. in this regard, the present study seeks to examine theus counterterrorism policy in west asia and discuss its relationshipwith the national security of the islamic republic of iran. thenecessity for conducting such research is to identify the hidden threatsof america by involving its allies in the region and confronting them,which is pursued in the form of coalitions and alliances or military andcivilian agreements between america and its allies. if this procedureis not managed wisely, it will put the interests of the islamic republicof iran in the region at risk, which requires identification andconfrontation. in this article, a descriptive-analytical method andlibrary tools have been used.