تعامل علوم اجتماعی و حقوق خانواده بر مبنای مصلحت مورد مطالعه: طلاق عاطفی

ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﻗﻮاﻧﯿﻦ و روﯾﻪﻫﺎی ﻗﻀﺎﯾﯽ در ﺣﻘﻮق ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده، ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪف ﺷﺎرع از ﺗﺸﮑﯿﻞ ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده، ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﮐﻼن ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده و ارزشﻫﺎی ﺑﻨﯿﺎدﯾﻦ آن ﻣﻐﺎﯾﺮ اﺳﺖ، ﺑﻠﮑﻪ ﺧﻮد آﺳﯿﺐﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﯽ را ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﯽﺷﻮد. از اﯾﻦرو، ﺿﺮوری اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﻟﻮازم و ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﻫﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮن و روﯾﻪای را در ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺮرﺳﯿﺪ. ﺑﻨﺪ ب ﻣﺎده‌ 80 ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﮥ ﭘﻨﺞﺳﺎﻟﮥ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﭘﯿﺸﺮﻓﺖ، از »اﺻﻼح ﻗﻮاﻧﯿﻦ و ﻣﻘﺮرات و ﺑﻬﺒﻮد ﻧﻈﺎم ﺣﮑﻤﺮاﻧﯽ در راﺳﺘﺎی ارﺗﻘﺎی ﺧﺎﻧﻮادهﻣﺪاری« ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﯽﮔﻮﯾﺪ. ﺑﺮای رﺳﯿﺪن ﺑﻪ اﯾﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﯾﺪ در ﺷﯿﻮه‌ اﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎط اﺣﮑﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده و ﻗﺎﻧﻮن ﮔﺬاری و اﺟﺮا ﺑﺎ درﻧﻈﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ آﺛﺎر و ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﻫﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮن ﺑﺎزﻧﮕﺮی ﺷﻮد. ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﯽ رﺳﺪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺮﯾﻦ راﻫﮑﺎر، ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪودوﺛﻐﻮر ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ و اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از آن در اﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎط و اﺟﺮای اﺣﮑﺎم از ﻣﺴﯿﺮ اﺣﮑﺎم ﺣﮑﻮﻣﺘﯽ اﺳﺖ. ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ آﺳﯿﺐ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽِ ﻣﻌﺘﻨﺎﺑﻬﯽ ﻣﺮﺑﻮط ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده ﺧﻼف ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﯽرﺳﺪ. ﺣﮑﻢ ﻋﻘﻞ و ﺑﻨﺎی ﻋﻘﻼ در رﺟﻮع ﺟﺎﻫﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ از ﺿﺮورت اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از دﺳﺘﺎوردﻫﺎی داﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪان ﻋﻠﻮم اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﮥ ﻣﺮﺟﻌﯽ ﺑﺮای ﺗﺸﺨﯿﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﭘﺮده ﺑﺮﻣﯽدارد. درواﻗﻊ، ﺿﺮورت ﺗﻐﯿﯿﺮ ﻗﻮاﻧﯿﻦ ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده در راﺳﺘﺎی ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﻧﺸﺎندﻫﻨﺪه‌ ﺿﺮورت اﻧﺠﺎم ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﻫﺎی ﻣﯿﺎنرﺷﺘﻪای ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﺑﺮای ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﯽ ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﯿﻦ ﻗﻮاﻧﯿﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ اﺳﺖ. اﯾﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﻣﺪﻋﯽ اﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده و ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺎﯾﺪ اﺻﻼﺣﺎت وﯾﮋه ای در ﻗﻮاﻧﯿﻦ ﻣﺮﺑﻮط ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده، از راه ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻋﻠﻮم اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ و ﺣﻘﻮق ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده اﻧﺠﺎم ﺷﻮد. در اﯾﻦ راﺳﺘﺎ، ﻃﻼق ﻋﺎﻃﻔﯽ را ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﯾﮑﯽ از آﺳﯿﺐ ﻫﺎی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﺑﺮﻣﯽرﺳﺪ و ﻟﻮازم ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ را ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ دﺳﺘﺎوردﻫﺎی ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﻋﻠﻮم اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ دﻧﺒﺎل ﻣﯽﮐﻨﺪ و راﻫﮑﺎرﻫﺎﯾﯽ را ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮنﮔﺬار ﭘﯿﺸﻨﻬﺎد ﻣﯽدﻫﺪ.

interaction of social sciences and family law based on expediency: case study: emotional divorce

some laws and judicial procedures in family law not only contradict the legislator's goal of forming a family and the interests of the family, but also cause various social harms. therefore, it is necessary to examine the social consequences of each law in the context of society. paragraph b of article 80 of the seventh five-year development plan speaks of reforming laws and regulations and improving the governance system in order to promote family-centeredness. to achieve this, the method of deducing family rulings, legislation, and implementation must be reviewed by considering the social consequences of each law. it seems that the most important solution is to pay attention to the limits and limitations of expediency and use it in deducing and implementing rulings from the path of government rulings. the ruling of reason and the foundation of reason in the ignorant's appeal to the learned reveals the necessity of using the achievements of social scientists as a reference for determining expediency. in fact, the necessity of changing family laws in line with social interests indicates the necessity of conducting credible interdisciplinary research for greater coordination between laws and social interests. this research claims that based on the interests of the family and society, special reforms should be made in family-related laws through the interaction of social sciences and family law. in this regard, it identifies emotional divorce as one of the social harms and pursues expedients according to the scientific achievements of social sciences and suggests solutions to the legislator.