Two Collaborative Feedback Models in Efl Writing Instruction: Do They Make A Difference?

Research in ll writing has found numerous benet its of employing collaborative learning in the classroom. the research findings on group work provide clear evidence that engaging learners in group activities increases opportunities for students to engage in the negotiation of meaning which further leads to better acquisition. the present stady, implementing two different collaborative feedback models, based on various sources and modes of feedback, examines the effect of each on the students' writing quality. sixty iranian students, majoring in english translation, were assigned into three homogeneous groups based on their obtained scores on oxford placement test (opt) and sample paragraph writing. they covered five topics in a sequence of ten written texts - before and after receiving feedback - over a 15-week semester. the results revealed that students incorporated both the teacher's and peers' oral/written comments in the process of draft editing, and that they benefited from the two collaborative feedback models almost equally. the interview results also confirmed co-operative learning as an effective teaching strategy that could be used to enhance achievement and socialization among students and to improve attitudes towards learning and working in groups, especially in efl settings.